Best case: Radioactive hell-icane that irradiates the entire ocean for a thousand years.
Worst case: Godzilla in addition to above.
So no bueno.
Well you would get either a Sharknado or Zombienado?
Why don’t we destroy tropical cyclones by nuking them? reads an article by Chris Landsea, a science and operations officer with the National Hurricane Center (NHC).
Apart from the fact that this might not even alter the storm, this approach neglects the problem that the released radioactive fallout would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating environmental problems.
“Needless to say, this is not a good idea.”A nuclear weapon wouldn’t have any appreciable impact on a hurricane because of the energy that would be needed to affect it, Landsea wrote.
Hurricanes can release energy at a rate of 5 to 20×1013 watts; that release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb that explodes every 20 minutes, he added.
Even if a nuclear bomb were to explode, it would produce a shock wave that would propagate away from the site of the explosion somewhat faster than the speed of sound.
And do that way too many times the Earth will be ocean free.Guys, I got this! We build a giant H bomb but, this is the important part, we build backwards so that instead of blowing up, it sucks in. We suck the hurricane into a little ball, wrap it in cling wrap, and drop it in the waste bin. Neat and tidy.
Umm... Trump scares me. Can he actully try this out?
Is there anyone that can stop him?
Guys, I got this! We build a giant H bomb but, this is the important part, we build backwards so that instead of blowing up, it sucks in. We suck the hurricane into a little ball, wrap it in cling wrap, and drop it in the waste bin. Neat and tidy.
No, he can not try this out. We're good. He's even on Twitter this morning denying he said it.
Yeah but, as folks have said, hurricanes pack orders of magnitude more energy than a nuke so if the bomb stops just one hurricane, we come out ahead. How many times has the coast been damaged by a nuke? I rest my case.Long story short, you'd have a lot of highly toxic radioactive materials spread around very quickly.
Phew .... was worried for a minute there!![]()
Just so folks understand the relative amounts of energy involved here.
- Atomic Bomb (Hiroshima): 6.3x10^13 joules of energy
- Tsar Bomba (largest bomb ever detonated): 2.4x10^17 joules
- Average Hurricane - Rain formation: 5.2x10^19joules/day + 1.2x10^17joules/day of wind kinetic energy.
- Increase in Ocean Heat Content 0-2000m over the last 50 years from global warming: 3.4x10^23joules.
So your average hurricane is putting out the equivalent of about 10 A-bombs a second or 1 Tsar Bomba every 6.5-7.0 minutes.
The increase in ocean heat could provide enough energy for an extra hurricane every day for 18 years. (Or the equivalent of detonating 3+ Tsar Bombas per hour or 205 A-Bombs per minute for 50 years).
(Folks like @SlowSpyder don’t believe that amount of energy will ever make any change whatsoever in the environment because Al Gore is a wizard).
Well, what chance has a nuke to destroy a hurricane if it's so weak in comparison? Plus, that radiation is bad for us. Originally it was buried in the ground. Scattered in the wind, it's kind of like Pandora's box effect. All manner of radioactive isotopes.Yeah but, as folks have said, hurricanes pack orders of magnitude more energy than a nuke so if the bomb stops just one hurricane, we come out ahead. How many times has the coast been damaged by a nuke? I rest my case.
No wewtake it and drop it in Mar lago…..Guys, I got this! We build a giant H bomb but, this is the important part, we build backwards so that instead of blowing up, it sucks in. We suck the hurricane into a little ball, wrap it in cling wrap, and drop it in the waste bin. Neat and tidy.