The Federal laws are in effect. Change them if they are wrong. Until then, to violate them is to take the chance that one can be caught and punished.
Also, the Feds may tie Federal funding to enforcement if CA passes such (which I doubt)
Just wondering that's all. It's interesting that a self styled conservative would be in favor of supporting the federal government's right to enter a state and arrest its citizens for something that the state itself considers legal, and for activity that in most cases is taking place completely within the state.
I'm not a huge states' rights person myself and so I'm relatively ambivalent about the whole thing, just noticed some dissonance there.