• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What were the 4 most significant/major battles of 1812?

Phuz

Diamond Member
I know Queenston Heights is one of them..
I'm going on nothing here!

And the Four most significant people (people involved with said battles.. ) Tecumseh is one of them...


Thank you for your help!
 
Battle of New Orleans.

War of 1812, but did not happen in 1812.
Does that count?

The Battle of New Orleans
1815

For this expedition the 93rd were deprived of their kilts and feathered bonnets and sent into action in tartan trews and a particularly unbecoming form of cocked Kilmarnock bonnet. But they were well led, and their morale was by now indestructible, though, as Private Neil McIntosh wrote home afterwards, "General Mismanagement" commanded throughout. The admirals, whose greed for prize-money is said to have prompted the whole expedition, were callous and incompetent. The Commander-in-Chief, Sir Edward Pakenham and his three brigade commanders were indecisive. None of the staff knew his job.

Kings Colour carried at the Battle of New Orleans
The 93rd landed on the evening of 23 December, having spent six days and nights packed in open boats exposed to rain, sleet and a bitter north wind. They moved up through the swamp where the advance guard was surprised by a night attack by 1,200 militiamen. By dawn the Americans withdrew, leaving behind 74 prisoners.
General Andrew Jackson (later to be President of the U.S.A.) made his stand behind the Rodriguez Canal 5 miles from New Orleans. Across his mile-long front he built, out of cotton bales and sugar casks filled with earth, a parapet twenty feet deep with a short glacis sloping down to the canal bank; and on it he mounted four well-protected heavy guns. Along the parapet, invisible and almost invulnerable, he had about 3,500 men.
On 28 December Pakenham drew up 750 yards in front of this position. On the 8th January after 2 unsuccessful advances he ordered the third. Everything went wrong. There was not enough earth to build gun batteries, only a quarter of the force could get across the canal.
On the right Lieutenant-Colonel Moleyns lost his head and led the 44th in a panic flight which spread to the rest of Major-General Samuel Gibbs's Brigade. A few gallant parties crossed the canal without ladders. Gibbs and Pakenham were killed.
On the left three light companies, among them the 93rd, stormed a redoubt on the river bank from which the whole enemy line could have been turned. But there too the Brigade Commander was killed, and the advance came to a standstill. The 93rd alone pushed out into the centre until they were only 1OO yards short of the ditch. Their Commanding Officer was killed. His successor would neither advance nor retire without a clear order. So there they stood rock-like, in close order, being slowly destroyed by the concentrated fire of the whole American line, until Lambert, the surviving General, after a careful survey, at last withdrew them. They came back with parade-ground precision, leaving three-quarters of their total strength killed or wounded and having laid the foundations of an immortal legend: a reputation for disciplined and indomitable courage. An American observer later commented; 'It was an act of cool determined bravery'. The British had nearly 2,000 casualties that day, of whom 557 were from the 93rd. The Americans behind their parapet had 6 killed and 7 wounded.
Ironically, lack of communication meant that neither side knew that peace had in fact been signed two weeks before the battle. Wounded prisoners, all of whom had been well treated in American hospitals, were returned; and the 93rd were able to muster half their original strength when they landed back in Britain
 


<< Battle of New Orleans.

War of 1812, but did not happen in 1812.
Does that count?
>>



Actually the Battle of New Orleans occured between December 1814 and January 1815.

EDIT: oops, the article you cited points that out.
 
I'm thinking the four majors were...

Isaac Brock (queenston/detriot)
Tecumseh (detriot)
James Madison (?)
William Hull (detriot)


?????
 
Your question is a little vague. Is it the 4 most significant battles that occurred in 1812? The 4 most significant battles of the War of 1812 that happened in 1812? The 4 most significant battles in the War of 1812? If you are simply talking about battles of 1812, regardless of wars, then Napoleon's assault on Moscow would be at or near the top of the list. If you are strictly talking about the War of 1812, then I'm not sure.
 
Cerebus451, sorry, i'll clarify.

It would be battles in North America only. It would be with regards to the fights fought surrounding the "war of 1812."

The Fall of Detroit..
Queenston Heights..

Not sure even myself, I know the question is very generalized.. 🙁

I'll update when some people get home from school so I can get more information on the subject. 🙁
 
Though it's called the War of 1812, it took place from 1812-1815. Sorry, I don't know the name of the battles, but I'd consider that the first, the burning of the White House, and certainly the battle where Tecumseh saved some British ass would be the most significant battles.
 
Back
Top