Originally posted by: th3Godfather
from what i've seen and from what i've had i'd say neither. 3.2 is a huge overclock for the 2.4 and i would expect you to increase the voltage in order to get up that high. i have a 2.6 and i can get it up to 3.2 @ 2.55, rock solid at 2.75. not sure if its just my chip or general for all 2.6's. dunno about others but from what i've seen people have been getting a 250 fsb at stock voltage on the 2.4s. anyone else?
According to Overclockers.com, the average overclock for a 2.6C is 3474 MHz, and the average overclock for a 2.4C is 3323 MHz.Originally posted by: hytek369
What is the best price/performance (overclocked performance) of these 2?
According to Overclockers.com, 6 out of 20 (30%) 2.6Cs that hit 3200 or above did so at stock voltage, whereas 13 out of 42 (30.95%) 2.4Cs that hit 3200 or above did so at stock voltage.Originally posted by: hytek369
I want at least 3.2ghz at default voltage, which is more feasible?
Originally posted by: FPSguy
According to Overclockers.com, the average overclock for a 2.6C is 3474 MHz, and the average overclock for a 2.4C is 3323 MHz.Originally posted by: hytek369
What is the best price/performance (overclocked performance) of these 2?
Price of a retail 2.6C at newegg: $208
Price of a retail 2.4C at newegg: $171
Overclocked Price/Performance for 2.6C: 5.98 cents/MHz
Overclocked Price/Performance for 2.4C: 5.15 cents/MHz
According to Overclockers.com, 6 out of 20 (30%) 2.6Cs that hit 3200 or above did so at stock voltage, whereas 13 out of 42 (30.95%) 2.4Cs that hit 3200 or above did so at stock voltage.Originally posted by: hytek369
I want at least 3.2ghz at default voltage, which is more feasible?
