What's funny about product placement is that companies will PAY a show to use their product, but if a show was to include their logo willingly because it just happens to be part of a prop or scenery, then they can get sued for trademark infringement lol. I always laugh when I see car logos blurred on TV shows because it's pretty obvious what kind of car it is, but they probably have to do it to avoid a lawsuit.
It's probably a control issue.
If a lovable character gets bludgeoned unconscious with a Dewalt DW511 hammer drill, and then sustains fatal injury when its durable 7.8 amp motor powers a Dewalt Rock Carbide® masonry bit through their skull, precisely hitting critical parts of their brain due to the Rock Carbide tip's reduced bit walking, Dewalt might have some grievances with that portrayal.
Or maybe it's just sitting on a shelf, and the main character, a handyman working on something in his garage, selects a Bosch hammer drill resting nearby simply because the Dewalt's battery was low, Dewalt's lawyers could still say something, though the letter would likely be worded a little bit less strongly.
Yep, up until 1990 commercials didn't break more than 20% of the show time. Now the average is 30% and it just gets worse.
The other problem is it's the same set of commercials every break
Marketing by Stockholm syndrome.
Wow, a variance? How do you think that conversation goes?
BBT Producers: We're lazy and want to make our show 18 minutes instead of 22 minutes. The upside is that you can sell 4 minutes more commercials. That's $2.5 million extra per week, 24 weeks, that works out to $50 million per season.
Network: Variance granted. Can we blow you in gratitude?
Does BBT have a theme/intro sequence too?
You can also pad out the runtime by 1) having an intro, and 2) lengthening it in later seasons.