• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What should the minimum wage be in the United States?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

How much should the minimum wage be in the United States?

  • $0/hr

  • $2/hr

  • $4/hr

  • $6/hr

  • $8/hr

  • $10/hr

  • $12/hr

  • $14/hr

  • $16/hr

  • $18/hr

Results are only viewable after voting.
homebrew2ny said:
Minimum wage should be the minimum amount a company needs to pay to get what is required to complete the task(s) needed competently. The fallacy that a set minimum wage somehow helps anyone is based in ignorance.
Click to expand...

Paying a worker more doesn't suddenly make them more skilled. Paying a worker less doesn't remove their basic requirements for shelter.
 
$0.

The real solution is a Basic Income Guarantee. Then people can have $1/hour wages or whatever their labor is worth. Otherwise enjoy your social unrest as everyone fights for ever decreasing jobs and real wages.
 
Rakehellion said:
A lot of those things didn't exist in the 1700's.



You're forced to work somewhere. Survival isn't optional.



So the other option is to boycott Walmart, so they have to lay off employees?
Click to expand...

I noticed that you did not respond to my point that you as well value someones labor at the lowest price possible. You are a hypocrite. Its terrible when people collectively do the same that you do, and thus push down the cost of labor because its slavery, but you as an individual it is just rational.

Walmart makes money, because it has found ways to make the cost of running much lower than any other company in that market. They not only save money on labor, but have worked out ways to make the supply chain as efficient as possible, thus further pushing down prices. Its pretty apparent you have little to no idea what point you are arguing. Your point that Walmart is modern slavery is disgusting and completely wrong.
 
realibrad said:
I noticed that you did not respond to my point that you as well value someones labor at the lowest price possible. You are a hypocrite. Its terrible when people collectively do the same that you do, and thus push down the cost of labor because its slavery, but you as an individual it is just rational.
Click to expand...

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. And I never said anything about slavery.
 
brandonb said:
I picked $0. Let the market decide. It's called economics. Let supply/demand of products dictate price as well as let supply/demand of skills and people dictate the wage they make.

If two factories sit side by side, one pays $2/hr, and the one next door pays $15/hr, where do you think the talent is going to go? The other factory will have to raise its wages if it wants any decent employees, and it will. Unless a monkey can do the job, and why pay $15 if it only takes a monkey?
Click to expand...

Your theoretical econ 100 view of the issue ignores a whole galaxy of other real world concepts.
 
PieIsAwesome said:
$0.

The real solution is a Basic Income Guarantee. Then people can have $1/hour wages or whatever their labor is worth. Otherwise enjoy your social unrest as everyone fights for ever decreasing jobs and real wages.
Click to expand...

That sounds kind of... palatable. :$
 
Rakehellion said:
Welfare?
Click to expand...

Nah, the goal of the $0 min wage crowd is to also eliminate all forms of welfare too. Just imagine the number of workers lining up for a $2 hour factory job when there's no welfare.

But again, who is going to buy the stuff? Doesn't matter how cheap your labor is when you can't sell your products.
 
Rakehellion said:
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. And I never said anything about slavery.
Click to expand...

You commented about my comment about Walmart being modern slavery. I liked your reply to mean that you also agreed that Walmart was modern slavery because of the context.

So, ill explain how you and the way you buy things is the reason Walmart pays its employees.

You see a CPU you want to buy. You don't just go to any place and pay what they are asking for it. Instead, you go online and shop around, or look through the adds to see if the CPU is on sale anywhere. You would never pay more for that CPU at tigerdirect when microcenter has it for $50 less. The retailers then look around, and realize they are not selling enough because their prices are too high. They come to the realization that they must somehow reduce their prices. If they have a large profit margin, they might cut it there. Its also true that they might be able to reduce the price of the CPU, by reducing other costs. So maybe they go with a different trucking company that does not cost as much, or maybe they move their warehouse to a place that has cheaper rent. All of this competition causes a downward pressure on the cost of transportation and production. One of the many factors of production and transportation is labor. So, if a worker is willing to get paid less, and the customer is always trying to pay the least amount for something they can, what is the logical step when all other expenses have been cut?

When you shop around, you create the cycle that puts downward pressure on wages. If you truly think that people should get paid more, open a business and try to pay people more. There is a reason companies dont pay more, and its competition to sell the cheapest product.
 
The choices available are too low. If corporate CEOs have a minimum of $10,000 per minute, why should the rest fumble in the gutter with $7.95 per hour? Let us all be rich and then we'll see just how special your fancy car and house really are.
 
realibrad said:
You commented about my comment about Walmart being modern slavery. I liked your reply to mean that you also agreed that Walmart was modern slavery because of the context.

So, ill explain how you and the way you buy things is the reason Walmart pays its employees.

You see a CPU you want to buy. You don't just go to any place and pay what they are asking for it. Instead, you go online and shop around, or look through the adds to see if the CPU is on sale anywhere. You would never pay more for that CPU at tigerdirect when microcenter has it for $50 less. The retailers then look around, and realize they are not selling enough because their prices are too high. They come to the realization that they must somehow reduce their prices. If they have a large profit margin, they might cut it there. Its also true that they might be able to reduce the price of the CPU, by reducing other costs. So maybe they go with a different trucking company that does not cost as much, or maybe they move their warehouse to a place that has cheaper rent. All of this competition causes a downward pressure on the cost of transportation and production. One of the many factors of production and transportation is labor. So, if a worker is willing to get paid less, and the customer is always trying to pay the least amount for something they can, what is the logical step when all other expenses have been cut?

When you shop around, you create the cycle that puts downward pressure on wages. If you truly think that people should get paid more, open a business and try to pay people more. There is a reason companies dont pay more, and its competition to sell the cheapest product.
Click to expand...
Buying local as much as possible is a partial antidote to this race to the bottom. We see this now in the resurgence of farmer's markets, for example. But most people simply don't care, up until someone in a far away cubicle gives them the axe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top