What program IYO is the best for making web pages?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0


<<

<<
Aww you messed it up. Guess you arent a userfriendly fan :p
Next should have been &quot;I edit the inodes by hand... With a magnet!)&quot; Oh well. Try not to use ed... Something about it just scares me
>>




Ahhh, sorry. I used to love UF. Then it seemed to turn into
&quot;Microsoft sucks, doesn't it?&quot;
&quot;Yes, Linux is good. I love Linus&quot;
&quot;I want to have his child&quot;

My bad, man.
>>



Ahh its ok. The best part of the strip was when the BSD devils were appearing trying to convince Greg(?) to switch to BSD :p
 

drwho9437

Member
Jun 22, 2001
77
0
0
Try out homesite or similar. It will help you as a beginner and you will pick up HTML as you go along. Once you know HTML well enough just use a text editor or you can stick to something like Homesite if you like. IF you want WYSIWYG then Dreamweaver is the typical recomendation.
 

kmmatney

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2000
4,363
1
81
I use Robohelp. It an HTML help authoring tool, but its also great at making web pages. Its is very expensive, though, but I have it for work.
 

Daemon_UK

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
806
0
0
synchronicity: I fully agree with you there. I think all web designers who do not code with a text editor should be rounded up and shipped off to MARS :D

rbV5: Back off!

My 2 cents, I think everyone should use vi.

Cheers
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0


<< I think all web designers who do not code with a text editor should be rounded up and shipped off to MARS >>

And any woodworker who uses electric tools should go with them! Same as any farmer who uses a tractor instead of his mule! And those damn jet airplanes! Why my grandpappy would be furious!

Are you Amish? or a Luddite?
 

huanaku

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,208
0
0
Dreamweaver is my favorite WYSIWYG editor. It's code is a lot cleaner than FP.
 

richleader

Golden Member
Jan 1, 2001
1,201
0
0
Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages?
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0


<< Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages? >>



Not my design or coding but one of the BEST pages on the net:
attrition
 

FOBSIDE

Platinum Member
Mar 16, 2000
2,178
0
0


<< Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages? >>



Primecut.net

this isnt my page. my friend uses a text editor to design his pages. obviously the flash isnt done with a text editor but his html section is done with a text editor.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,795
1,976
126


<< Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages? >>



Here's mine

Coast102.com also used to be mine, but my friend messed it up. Big time.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,795
1,976
126


<<

<< I think all web designers who do not code with a text editor should be rounded up and shipped off to MARS >>

And any woodworker who uses electric tools should go with them! Same as any farmer who uses a tractor instead of his mule! And those damn jet airplanes! Why my grandpappy would be furious!

Are you Amish? or a Luddite?
>>



That's kind of an invalid comparison. The reason *I* dislike webpages that use WYSIWYG editors
is that they are (everyone I've seen anyway) not W3C compliant. If you make a page, it needs
to be W3C compliant so that everyone can view it. Browser specific tags suck. Sites made
with them annoy users without those browsers, and they miss out on the intended effect.
 

bevancoleman

Golden Member
Jun 24, 2001
1,080
0
0
WYSIWYG: Dreamweaver, any application that convert Word 2k HTML into readable, well layed out HTML gets my vote :)

UltraEdit for hand codeing, supports colour coding, etc... And is possably the best Text/Hex editor anyway.
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0


<< Browser specific tags suck. >>

I agree. That's why I don't use them. It's entirely possible to use FrontPage (for example) and not use IE-specific tags. I do it all the time. But W3C compliance doesn't guarantee your page will display properly. 99% of the people out there are using browsers that are not compliant. That's why a concientious developer tests his or her pages on a wide range of platforms and browsers.
 

flavio

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,823
1
76
Allaire Homesite



<< Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages? >>



Here's one I did at work.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0


<< Ok, some of you hotshots that use pure text editors to design html, let's see some of your web pages? >>



Whats amazing is that we have shown some nice pages but richleader has not commented on any of the submissions...
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0
Maybe richleader has a life (unlike some of us :D) and doesn't check in 3 times a day. I'll make a comment to get the ball rolling - aside from the site flavio linked they are so simple it would be hard for them to not be W3C compliant! I'm not saying they are bad, just that they are very elementary.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0


<< Maybe richleader has a life (unlike some of us :D) and doesn't check in 3 times a day. I'll make a comment to get the ball rolling - aside from the site flavio linked they are so simple it would be hard for them to not be W3C compliant! I'm not saying they are bad, just that they are very elementary. >>



You only check the site 3 times a day? ;)
Anyhow, simple is good. KISS = Keep It Simple Stupid. I personally cannot stand sites that just have too much going on. That is why I love the attrition site ;)