What PBS doesn't want you to see

[JulesMaximus]

the school lunch calendar fucking lied, this is what they're actually serving for breakfast:

I don't know if I should eat it or fuck it...

 

[Jeff7]

I don't now if I should eat it or fuck it...

It looks like someone already did the latter.

 

[alevasseur14]

If you are seriously interested in the topic, there's a ton of information available.

Would you like me to point you to some resources?

I could point you to the evidence that was brought up during Kitzmiller v. DASB that proves Intelligent Design changed every single mention of Creationism/Creator to Intelligent Design/Designer after the Creationism movement was dealt a fatal blow in Edwards v. Aguillard. Would that tickle your fancy?

Serious. Barbara Forest got a hold of draft versions of Of Pandas and People (This 'textbook' sparked the Kitzmiller case) and in every single instance, Creationism was conveniently substituted with ID.

Now, back to reading the rest of the thread. In a way, this thread served as a motivator to start typing up my senior thesis that I wrote on this very subject. Thanks PJW!!

 

[hans030390]

It looks like someone already did the latter.

Sorry guys. It's still warm if you want a go.

 

[PhineasJWhoopee]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

 

[IronWing]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

You still haven't found a single useful result of applying creationist principles in the conduct of science? Pathetic. Here we face massive resource issues that science can partially address and you're busy masturbating with your sock puppet and encouraging others to do the same instead of doing the hard thinking required to solve real world problems.

 

[lxskllr]

You still haven't found a single useful result of applying creationist principles in the conduct of science? Pathetic. Here we face massive resource issues that science can partially address and you're busy masturbating with your sock puppet and encouraging others to do the same instead of doing the hard thinking required to solve real world problems.

 

[JulesMaximus]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

I watched it and I'm not shocked. His explanation seems perfectly reasonable to me.

What is your explanation? Sky fairies created it? Oh yeah, that sounds plausible.

And Naturalism is not a religion; never has been...never will be.

Best rap I've ever seen on religion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Best rap I've ever seen on religion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

No, the best rap on religion is this one.

 

[hans030390]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief...

I also used to think something like that...changed my mind very quickly after doing research about it.

 

[Nik]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

Why do you need a savior?

You still haven't presented any real evidence for there even being a creator or why one needs to exist.

 

[Molondo]

Stop replying to him, he is just trolling now.

 

[zinfamous]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

Bow before Gilligan!


(you're still posting in the wrong thread)

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

That's precisely what Loki wants you to believe....

 

[BeauJangles]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

The entire scientific community has been engaged in the largest conspiracy in the history of mankind for the last 200 years.

YOU ARE SO SMART FOR FIGURING IT OUT.

 

[zinfamous]

Stop replying to him, he is just trolling now.

as opposed to.....?

 

[Delita]

The resaon for the harsh reaction is that naturalism is a religious belief and no one like to have their relgious beliefs challenged, The "savior" for the naturalist is time, as if time could make the impossible possible. It curious how they've double and redoubled the age of the universe as their beliefs become more and more improbable as scientific knowledge grows.

It's clear why the naturalists don't want to debate. Dawkins can't even answer a simple, staright forward question related to his belief system! If you watch this and aren't shocked at how pathetic and intellectually bankrupt Dawkins' beliefs are, I don't know what to say to you. And he is one of the leading spokemouths!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Here are some ID/Creation links:

http://www.rae.org/revevlnk.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uz1CiDDIq4&feature=related

 

[ShawnD1]

as opposed to.....?

Being retarded?

 

[Nik]

Stop replying to him, he is just trolling now.

So? If his intention is to be proven wrong again and again and again, I'm happy to oblige.

 

[IcePickFreak]

I will pray for your soul. ()