I have a non twin sister who's quite older than me, we're both gingers. Not sure about other genes. That does not answer your question but it may provide a single data point.
Actually it would be interesting to do something like 23 And Me test between siblings and compare both see if/how they differ.
Been kinda intrigued about trying that actually even just for myself. The medical related info could be interesting and I'm actually not too sure about my early ancestry and that would provide some clues. I suspect Irish but not too sure. Just something cool to know.
If the father gives 23 chromosomes and the mother gives 23 chromosomes, and the likelihood that the child's chromosomes contain a mix of the mother and fathers, then I think between two children with the same parents, it would be 50%.
You're ~99.5% just like your worst enemy, and only ~99.75% like your sibling.
Maybe it's the reverse...I'm still convinced my sister was from the UPS guy and not my Dad.
100% happens surprisingly often. 0% only happens in the movies.The correct answer is 0-100% (only counting the parts that can vary between people since we're all 99.5% the same info) but with the extremes so unlikely that it is safe to just say 50%.
Not with the posed "non-identical twin sibling" restriction in the first post!100% happens surprisingly often. 0% only happens in the movies.
![]()
Enough for you to be worried, OP, at least if you have any family, are prone to murdering people, and have family prone to murdering people. Say you're careful and cover your tracks, but leave some dna behind because of one careless moment, and further, that a member of your family has dna stored in a database, because they were careless. In this case they would be able to get a partial match between your brothers profile and that found at the crime scene. Any decent detective is probably going to go after one of their siblings, ie. you. Be careful out there.