- Apr 17, 2004
- 17,555
- 1
- 0
So I'm seeing mixed results, some people rely on 12+ hours of Prime95 and others use SuperPI 32M?
Well, I agree that 12+ hours of Prime95 is the better bet, but here's the catch. Last night I had just setup my new 170 & DFI Ultra-D setup and wanted to run Prime95 overnight to kind of break things in a little. Well, it had been going for somewhere between 6-8 hours and I STILL got an error with everything bone stock. I didn't change a single setting and temps weren't breaking 35C.
So I'm curious: just because Prime95 fails @ 2.7GHz all the way up to 1.61V, does that mean it actually isn't stable for actual usage? I know that if it can't pass prime, it technically isn't 100% stable, but if it doesn't actually affect me in any major way does it REALLY matter.....?
Well, I agree that 12+ hours of Prime95 is the better bet, but here's the catch. Last night I had just setup my new 170 & DFI Ultra-D setup and wanted to run Prime95 overnight to kind of break things in a little. Well, it had been going for somewhere between 6-8 hours and I STILL got an error with everything bone stock. I didn't change a single setting and temps weren't breaking 35C.
So I'm curious: just because Prime95 fails @ 2.7GHz all the way up to 1.61V, does that mean it actually isn't stable for actual usage? I know that if it can't pass prime, it technically isn't 100% stable, but if it doesn't actually affect me in any major way does it REALLY matter.....?