For a server where I had to use Linux, it would be Slackware 7.1. I haven't used SuSE 7.1 (damnit they won't put an ISO on their site and I don't have money to buy it) but SuSE 7.0 really impressed me as a great desktop replacement for Win2k.
Thanks konichiwa but that's the live eval version. SuSE puts out two versions...one that's a "real" installation and the live-eval which I think just runs off the CD (never tried it but I've been told to stay away). Can anybody clarify this for me?
servers= FreeBSD (not really linux, but close) because of effiecient resource handling and many other reasons,
desktop= Redhat, for ease of use, and "tweakable", its the one that has kind of grown on me. Plus it has a lot of apps available.
im surprised to find a suse person here, not many at AT, i too love suse, but i have been dying to use mandrake, i have heard nothing but good things about it.
I use storm linux. It has the niceities of Debian (apt-get and the like, rock stable) with some nice little GUI stuff.
I started linux with Slackware so I have to say it is still one of my favorites. I was ecstatic the first time I set up Samba properly on Slackware 4.0.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.