What kind of WU times are ppl getting w/ 1.4 TB?

[smp]

Just curious.. running a new rig through the paces... it's my friend's, just wanted to know what ppl are averaging w/ this chip? I got it on a KT`133a.

 

[networkman]

I'm averaging a little over 5 hours on my Tbird 1000@1300 Cas2; sorry, I don't remember which board it is.

 

[PieDerro]

Networkman are you running on Win2K??

How do the oses compare in SETI?

BTW, my TBird 1.36turns in WU's in about 5:50 under Win98SE.

Regards
PieDerro

 

[LadyStarDust]

I have noticed a slight improvement on my WU times with 2K. I used to use win98FE and the VlAR's would kill me. Actually they still do on my daughters celeron, but she just doesn't want that dual boot into 2K. Did you ever try to argue with a 16 year old girl......don't.

 

[PieDerro]

Ladystardust i know what you mean about the 16yo girl!! haha!!

Call me ignorant, but I don't know what a VLAR is? I've heard it mentioned before, but i don't know what it is...

PieDerro

 

[LadyStarDust]

Very Low Angle Range...Work Unit. not a good thing to get.

 

[PieDerro]

oh rightio... thanks!

PieDerro

 

[ledzepp98]

my t-bird @1496 (11x136) on an 8k7a (amd760 ddr mobo) averages 4:30 with win2k

 

[IsOs]

A 1.4 GHz Tbird running at stock speed will complete a workunit with angle of .417 about 5 hours & 20 mins.

 

[m00kie]

1.4 TBird @1.5 (10x150) with DDR = 4' 22"

(for a .417 WU running Win2K)

 

[Confused]

This page (from my SetiQueue) shows the results from my Athlon 1.0@1.43GHz (110*13, KT7), computer name is "confused"

but a KT7A mobo will have a higher FSB, so that will bring the times down a bit

ConfusedBW

 

[CurtOien]

I have a 1.33 currently running 11 X 133 = 1.46
My times are about 4hrs or 4.5 hrs depending on the angle range of the work unit.
A VLAR takes me about 6.75 hrs.