• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What kind of flower is this?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SAWYER

Lifer
5784249137_510225d442_b.jpg


I have this one and some just like it but white that bloomed fairly quick over the last few days
 
The Lily And The Amaryllis

While exhibiting a pretty Amaryllis to a person fond of flowers, and with some desire to know about them, though too modest to permit one to say she had botanical tendencies, the writer was asked: "You say this is not a lily but an amaryllis, and that it belongs to a very different family of plants; but it looks like a lily to me. How can you tell it is not a lily?" It was a good chance to explain that there was often not much difference in nature between families of plants placed widely apart by botanists; that in some cases organs free from one another would make one distinction, while the same organs united would be the leading distinction in another. And it was the case here. In the Amaryllis the tube of the perianth was united with the ovarium, and thus the seed vessel seemed to be below the flower, while in the lily the perianth or showy floral part was not united, and hence the seed vessel would seem to be placed inside or above. In this way we could see at a glance that the lily was not an amaryllis, or a plant of the amaryLis flower was not a lily.
 
The Lily And The Amaryllis

While exhibiting a pretty Amaryllis to a person fond of flowers, and with some desire to know about them, though too modest to permit one to say she had botanical tendencies, the writer was asked: "You say this is not a lily but an amaryllis, and that it belongs to a very different family of plants; but it looks like a lily to me. How can you tell it is not a lily?" It was a good chance to explain that there was often not much difference in nature between families of plants placed widely apart by botanists; that in some cases organs free from one another would make one distinction, while the same organs united would be the leading distinction in another. And it was the case here. In the Amaryllis the tube of the perianth was united with the ovarium, and thus the seed vessel seemed to be below the flower, while in the lily the perianth or showy floral part was not united, and hence the seed vessel would seem to be placed inside or above. In this way we could see at a glance that the lily was not an amaryllis, or a plant of the amaryLis flower was not a lily.


Ummm...yeah, ok...still looks like a lily...probably an asiatic lily to me.

These are what I think of when I think of amaryllis:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...m=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1249&bih=799

These are asiatic lilies:
http://www.google.com/search?q=asia...pJYrOiALKmpDqCQ&ved=0CEYQsAQ&biw=1249&bih=799

I freely admit, I don't know shit about botany...and I think amaryllis are a form of lily...but the one in the OP doesn't look to me like the standard amaryllis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top