Zebo
Elite Member
- Jul 29, 2001
- 39,398
- 19
- 81
Save money, wait for dumbshits to lose their assets, buy up cheap shit, profit.
Ammo is not deflating... wonder why?
Just a PSA - takes about 10,000 rounds per kill in a war zone.
Last edited:
Save money, wait for dumbshits to lose their assets, buy up cheap shit, profit.
1. Go to war and create artificial demand/supply of military goods which constantly needs to be replaced. Oh....I forgot, we're already in a couple of wars and it's not working.
2. Massive government debt spending to create artifical demand/supply of goods and services. Oh...I forgot, we've already done this over the past ~2 years and it's not working.
3. Bend over and kiss your a$$ goodbye?
So far,
some people want to cut government spending during a recession. one vote to deport the poor. A couple of votes to do nothing and let it happen. one vote to starting hoarding and buying guns to protect the hoard.
Ammo is not deflating... wonder why?
Just a PSA - takes about 10,000 rounds per kill in a war zone.
I used to have a drinking problem I knew I should have fixed it with another bottle of whiskey instead of running in this heat day in day out.
I have a hard time believing that. If you simply add up all the rounds spent and divide by kills, maybe if you included vehicle mounted fire. Miniguns that throw out thousands of round per minute will shred a vehicle or building to pieces to kill the couple of occupants. You can't really count that though.
For small arms combat the number isn't anything like that. Hell, just some quick math says that a whole platoon doesn't carry that much ammo, I'd hope they'd get more than one kill after spending everything they carried.
This is a good post bro. And nothing "negative" about it... only positive can come of it in the long run. Think about how Great Depression people were, such as your grandparents, aka the greatest generation with virtues like frugality, honesty, workers, politically involved etc. They didn't get that way by accident- they went through hell called the Great depression and experiences shaped them. Likewise, these so-called entitled brats we have today will become out of necessity visa vi the Greater Depression and another 60 years of prosperity will result.Bernanke will most likely try quantitative easing again. I read something today (FT I think) that suggests we would need ~ $5 trillion QE for the 2nd attempt...about 3x what we did in the first bailout. But with Europe pulling back spending in favor of austerity, combined with fact that the first bailout was hugely unpopular, the political will for a 2nd attempt isn't there. If Bernanke does it, my guess is it won't have the desired effect, and certainly not without joint cooperation from Europe.
Nope, time to pay the piper suckers. There will be deflation...creditors will get crushed and the long term unemployed will be really fucked. Unfortunately, we lived beyond our means so long and there is so much debt there's no other way but to have it all burn down and start over. Sorry to be so negative...maybe look in the mirror at what y'all helped create?
This is a good post bro. And nothing "negative" about it... only positive can come of it in the long run. Think about how Great Depression people were, such as your grandparents, aka the greatest generation with virtues like frugality, honesty, workers, politically involved etc. They didn't get that way by accident- they went through hell called the Great depression and experiences shaped them. Likewise, these so-called entitled brats we have today will become out of necessity visa vi the Greater Depression and another 60 years of prosperity will result.
Check out The Fourth Turning - this 80 yr cycle is natural and should be embraced. Not that you have much choice.
Much better to rack up government debt due to declining revenues and higher unemployment and get stuck in a deflationary cycle much longer.
And this, boys and girls, is why we're doomed.
Much better to rack up government debt due to declining revenues and higher unemployment and get stuck in a deflationary cycle much longer.
Much better to rack up government debt due to declining revenues and higher unemployment and get stuck in a deflationary cycle much longer.
Explain.
Use detailed analysis. Not rhetoric.
Lets filter out the classic ATP&N lefty vs righty name calling.
What are the options for dealing with an economy that is facing a deflationary spiral?
What economic solutions do you support?
