illusion88
Lifer
- Oct 2, 2001
- 13,164
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: SuperGroove
well, I believe the B-29, in particular the Enola Gay, to be one of the most important military aircraft of all time.
Sucks.
Originally posted by: Justin218
Maybe the spitfire. It helped win the battle of britain. If hitler took britain things would have been drastically different.
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
IL-2 Sturmovik. Most successful ground attack bird of WWII. Most mass produced plane in history.
A flying tank, several german aces write of watching their cannon shells bounce off IL-2's.
IL-2s could carry huge amounts of weapons, and could suffer amazing amounts of damage. An IL-2 pilot writes of having a bomb on his wing explode in flight. . . and the wing remaining attached. Also, meter-sized holes in the wing would not down one.
P-51 was just escort, and its only stellar characteristic was its range.
The 262 was too late and not mass produced enough to seriously affect the outcome.
The IL-2 first saw action in 1941 and remained the mainstay of the soviet bomber force for the duration of the war.
There really is no contest.
without it, the ussr could have fallen, and the other allies would have to face a germany that could concentrate on only one front.
My dad's friend was the pilot. He said he went insane after he saw pics of what happened.Originally posted by: CFster
I agree. Had a terrible purpouse, but was probably the most significant military flight of all time.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
B-52 Stratofortress: Nuclear capable, huge, built like a tank, and fast. It was far superior to anything the Soviet Union had, it's still in service and will be until at least 2040.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
IL-2 Sturmovik. Most successful ground attack bird of WWII. Most mass produced plane in history.
A flying tank, several german aces write of watching their cannon shells bounce off IL-2's.
IL-2s could carry huge amounts of weapons, and could suffer amazing amounts of damage. An IL-2 pilot writes of having a bomb on his wing explode in flight. . . and the wing remaining attached. Also, meter-sized holes in the wing would not down one.
P-51 was just escort, and its only stellar characteristic was its range.
The 262 was too late and not mass produced enough to seriously affect the outcome.
The IL-2 first saw action in 1941 and remained the mainstay of the soviet bomber force for the duration of the war.
There really is no contest.
without it, the ussr could have fallen, and the other allies would have to face a germany that could concentrate on only one front.
Jesus christ you are stupid.
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
IL-2 Sturmovik. Most successful ground attack bird of WWII. Most mass produced plane in history.
A flying tank, several german aces write of watching their cannon shells bounce off IL-2's.
IL-2s could carry huge amounts of weapons, and could suffer amazing amounts of damage. An IL-2 pilot writes of having a bomb on his wing explode in flight. . . and the wing remaining attached. Also, meter-sized holes in the wing would not down one.
P-51 was just escort, and its only stellar characteristic was its range.
The 262 was too late and not mass produced enough to seriously affect the outcome.
The IL-2 first saw action in 1941 and remained the mainstay of the soviet bomber force for the duration of the war.
There really is no contest.
without it, the ussr could have fallen, and the other allies would have to face a germany that could concentrate on only one front.
Jesus christ you are stupid.
And you are smart? Do you know anything about WWII aircraft other than the classic american dogma (Mustang won the war!)?
I think, perhaps, that you should bother to know something before you post it.
The P-51 was a good aircraft. It was no stellar. At altitude, the Me-262 is much better. The P-51 stalled very easily and viciously, due to the new laminar flow airefoil. It was absolutely worthless at a turnfight. In addition, it could hardly take any damage before its engine quite. the 6 50's it carried were good, but the 190's the Germans flew could withstand a hail of machine gun fire and generally keep flying. A single Mk. 108 cannon round, however, would rip a P-51 to shreds. Most late-war FW-190's carried two Mk. 108 cannons. The Me-262 had four Mk. 108's.
In addition, the 51's only duty was to escort B-17's and other assorted bombers. If either of the two wins 'most important,' it is the fortress. The P-51 was not so terrible to the german pilots, the only problem was that there were so damn many of them.
I'm saying that I think the Sturmovik was the most influential aircraft in the most infleuntial war of modern times, and I think I have evidence on my side. I could go look up production figures for you . . .
It was a tank, it outdid the Stuka in every way. They were nearly impossible to shoot down. They were fast for a bomber. They had enough range to get to a target and back. They could weather direct AA shell hits. There were thousands and thousands of them. They helped the Soveits turn the ground war back on the Germans.
I can't think of any other A/C that influenced history as much as the IL-2.
So, to retaliate in kind: No, YOU'RE stupid!
troll.
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
IL-2 Sturmovik. Most successful ground attack bird of WWII. Most mass produced plane in history.
A flying tank, several german aces write of watching their cannon shells bounce off IL-2's.
IL-2s could carry huge amounts of weapons, and could suffer amazing amounts of damage. An IL-2 pilot writes of having a bomb on his wing explode in flight. . . and the wing remaining attached. Also, meter-sized holes in the wing would not down one.
P-51 was just escort, and its only stellar characteristic was its range.
The 262 was too late and not mass produced enough to seriously affect the outcome.
The IL-2 first saw action in 1941 and remained the mainstay of the soviet bomber force for the duration of the war.
There really is no contest.
without it, the ussr could have fallen, and the other allies would have to face a germany that could concentrate on only one front.
Jesus christ you are stupid.
And you are smart? Do you know anything about WWII aircraft other than the classic american dogma (Mustang won the war!)?
I think, perhaps, that you should bother to know something before you post it.
The P-51 was a good aircraft. It was no stellar. At altitude, the Me-262 is much better. The P-51 stalled very easily and viciously, due to the new laminar flow airefoil. It was absolutely worthless at a turnfight. In addition, it could hardly take any damage before its engine quite. the 6 50's it carried were good, but the 190's the Germans flew could withstand a hail of machine gun fire and generally keep flying. A single Mk. 108 cannon round, however, would rip a P-51 to shreds. Most late-war FW-190's carried two Mk. 108 cannons. The Me-262 had four Mk. 108's.
In addition, the 51's only duty was to escort B-17's and other assorted bombers. If either of the two wins 'most important,' it is the fortress. The P-51 was not so terrible to the german pilots, the only problem was that there were so damn many of them.
I'm saying that I think the Sturmovik was the most influential aircraft in the most infleuntial war of modern times, and I think I have evidence on my side. I could go look up production figures for you . . .
It was a tank, it outdid the Stuka in every way. They were nearly impossible to shoot down. They were fast for a bomber. They had enough range to get to a target and back. They could weather direct AA shell hits. There were thousands and thousands of them. They helped the Soveits turn the ground war back on the Germans.
I can't think of any other A/C that influenced history as much as the IL-2.
So, to retaliate in kind: No, YOU'RE stupid!
troll.
