What is up with Toms Hardware?!?!?!?!?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,264
3
81
Originally posted by: eastvillager
You're ignoring an important fact: Minesweeper was obviously their benchmark application. That rig is a SWEET rig for playing minesweeper. :)

think they can break 5 seconds?
 

jbubrisk

Senior member
Oct 6, 2005
506
0
71
Originally posted by: guoziming
Originally posted by: eastvillager
You're ignoring an important fact: Minesweeper was obviously their benchmark application. That rig is a SWEET rig for playing minesweeper. :)

think they can break 5 seconds?

I don't know, Intel Integrated 'Extreme' Graphics Processing might beat it... Bet they could get it down to four with that.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,727
46
91
Originally posted by: jbubrisk
Originally posted by: Smartazz
Maybe whoever wrote the article thought that gaming is cpu dependant like many do.

Well, it depends on the game. But basically if you don't have a DECENT GFX card, then it doesn't matter what CPU you have, and vice versa. Bottlenecks man.

you are more than likely to be bottlenecked by a gpu than a cpu today.
 

Smartazz

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2005
6,128
0
76
Originally posted by: jbubrisk
Originally posted by: Smartazz
Maybe whoever wrote the article thought that gaming is cpu dependant like many do.

Well, it depends on the game. But basically if you don't have a DECENT GFX card, then it doesn't matter what CPU you have, and vice versa. Bottlenecks man.

I know about bottlenecks, I have a friend who thinks that gaming is all in the cpu and brags to me because his cpu is a tad faster than mine, but I have a far better video card, some people are ignorant, some people don't know gaming is gpu limited.
 

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
Originally posted by: guozimingyeah that article was pretty stupid. but, the watercooling wasn't such a bad idea, especially for the 805. If you think about it, if you can get the 805 stable at 4ghz with a WC kit that keeps the CPU + cooling cost under $300, it's an excellent deal. I only trust THG for articles that can't really be wrong, like overclocking the 805.
That's not an excellent deal. For that much, you could just get a 165 opteron and get better formance with less effort.

 

Smartazz

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2005
6,128
0
76
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Originally posted by: guozimingyeah that article was pretty stupid. but, the watercooling wasn't such a bad idea, especially for the 805. If you think about it, if you can get the 805 stable at 4ghz with a WC kit that keeps the CPU + cooling cost under $300, it's an excellent deal. I only trust THG for articles that can't really be wrong, like overclocking the 805.
That's not an excellent deal. For that much, you could just get a 165 opteron and get better formance with less effort.

No you can't, an opteron 165 costs $330 almost everywhere but mwave.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Dumb article. You need to buy a watercooling setup and a good PSU to handle the watercooling and all the power the OCed CPU requires... all for a budget system running a X1300. Bunch of morons. If you want to OC, go with a 930 that you can OC to 4ghz on the stock HSF (and you don't need an extreme PSU), and invest in a better GPU.
 

Smartazz

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2005
6,128
0
76
Originally posted by: Looney
Dumb article. You need to buy a watercooling setup and a good PSU to handle the watercooling and all the power the OCed CPU requires... all for a budget system running a X1300. Bunch of morons. If you want to OC, go with a 930 that you can OC to 4ghz on the stock HSF (and you don't need an extreme PSU), and invest in a better GPU.

It's Tom's hardware, what did you expect?
 

Trevelyan

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2000
4,077
0
71
Yeah that's stupid. You can spend $200 on a video card, $250 on cpu/motherboard and $75 on ram and have a MUCH better gaming rig than that.
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,571
178
106
Originally posted by: Smartazz
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Originally posted by: guozimingyeah that article was pretty stupid. but, the watercooling wasn't such a bad idea, especially for the 805. If you think about it, if you can get the 805 stable at 4ghz with a WC kit that keeps the CPU + cooling cost under $300, it's an excellent deal. I only trust THG for articles that can't really be wrong, like overclocking the 805.
That's not an excellent deal. For that much, you could just get a 165 opteron and get better formance with less effort.

No you can't, an opteron 165 costs $330 almost everywhere but mwave.

You can get OEM 165's from Monarch for $275 with their nearly weekly coupon codes. That is, if you can stand to stomach Monarch.