Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: palehorse74
...
I know you probably covered the Laws of War in OCS, or elsewhere - and I did too. As the GC's are written, there is too much ambiguity in their definition of mistreatment, or torture. They certainly do NOT spell out what crosses the lines from discomfort to torture. When they wrote the GC's, they expected their interpretation to be as obvious as you make them out to be - but they're not.
So, the DoD has its own interpretations, and they (we), of course, err wayyyy on the side of caution by preventing any/all physical interrogation methods - NONE are allowed. period.
Other agencies, all over the world, however, have a much more liberal interpretation of the same ambiguous statements in the GC's.
So things may not be as black and white as you describe.
That said, as a member of the military, none of this applies to me because I (we) are strictly forbidden from using ANY method not listed in FM 2-22.3. But that still doesnt mean that other methods are not worthy of discussion. After all, many members of the military eventually go on to work for "other agencies"... so none of us knows where we'll be in five years, or what we'll be asked to do once we're there.
We must be prepared for those decisions; and the best way to do that is through introspection, and to debate as many of them as possible well ahead of time!
see my point?
I'm not sure how much stock I'd put in how "other agencies" do things, since many of them seem incapable of finding their collective ass with both hands and a map when it comes to human intelligence. And in any case, while the military has a long history of dealing with prisoners of war, and while domestic law enforcement has a long history of dealing with apprehended criminals, foreign intelligence agencies have very little experience dealing with prisoners of any sort on the kind of scale we're talking about here. Frankly, I don't think they are the best people to be leading the way on this...I think we'd be much better off listening to the folks who have actually DONE that sort of thing before.
And let's be honest, it's not like the methods being discussed are new ideas that we haven't talked about before. Mistreating prisoners to extract information is hardly a new idea, and most of the proposed methods for doing so have been around for hundreds of years. And really, it's all been discussed to death already...and in every case, we reached a point at which it was decided that certain methods were NOT worthy of discussion any more because they weren't in keeping with the kind of civilization we want to represent.
You're point isn't that we need to engage in some introspection to figure out right from wrong...hell, we did that decades ago when we decided that we were no longer going to conduct ourselves in the barbaric way the rest of the world did, when we decided that our objections to Japan and Germany in WWII went beyond their goal of taking over the world into their treatment of people as they tried to achieve that goal. We KNOW it's wrong, we've known it for years. So what you're really saying is that you want us to suddenly place every idea on equal ideological footing, and pretend that every idea is equally worthy of consideration, no matter how horrible or backward it may be.
I know it's wrong, you know it's wrong, and God damn if everyone else doesn't know it too. And seeing everyone trying to prance around the issue makes me want to punch somebody in the face. What the FUCK is wrong with this country?
How can you act as though noise/light/temperature/sleep fluctuations, or isolation, are as cut-and-dry evil, as water-boarding?! Let's try to think beyond binary here, or black-and-white, and discuss the line where "torture" is actually drawn. AFAIC, causing disorientation through the above mentioned light/noise/etc does not cross that line; AND, those methods which merely cause
temporary disorientation in a subject HAVE actually been proven effective.
I might equate them to taking advantage of the "shock of capture" effect you might have heard of... it's one of the best times to question someone, and if messing with light, noise, sleep, etc. has the same effect, and is temporary, how can it be classified as torture?
Given the ambiguities of the GC's, and the vast difference between disorientation and torture, what's not to discuss? Why are you so worried about people merely discussing the subject? Is it taboo? Forbidden? In bad taste? Offensive?
seriously, why stimy debate on something this important?
Please tell me WHY light/noise/temp/sleep fluctuations are torture. What makes them such? Spell out your reasoning just as I've spelled out my reason for feeling otherwise.