Oh and skace, thats funny, in Sweden, many people use snus as a substitute for ciggarettes, since everyone on this side of the big pool agrees that it's far less dangerous than ciggarettes.
"Everyone" agreeing doesn't necessarily mean that "Snus" is really any more or less dangerous than any other tobacco. At the end of the day, as Roger points out, tobacco is tobacco and is a carcinogen.
I spotted the part on the website you posted that points out that Swedes were the first to meet WHO non-smoking demographic targets, and I suspect it's in part because enough smokers were convinced to change their nicotine delivery systems from smoking to Snussing, if you'll forgive my creating a new word.
A red light flashes in my mind because the connection that Swedish gov't may be so supportive of snus for the following reasons:
#1 Makes them look good before the world population to say that they lowered smoking rates before any other country in the EU
#2 Snus appears to be an indigenous Swedish product, and could be a cash cow if sold in other parts of the world (kind of like those gasketless
Swimming Goggles that are known the world over). Unfortunately, any tobacco product carries a stigma in most countries, so it is in Swedes' best interest to minimize the apparent risks of the product.
#3 Presumably, if Sweden's governing body is anything like most others in the west, it's probably a majority of men. Since 22% of Swedish men use Snus, then it's probably safe to assume that a similar number of government officals use Snus and all of them have an interest in officially deluding themselves from being convinced their habit is dangerous.
In your defense, I will say that types of tobacco from different parts of the world are wildly different in taste, texture and aroma. Go smell the average American cigarette, and then go smell latakia or perique. You'd never guess that all three are tobaccoes.
The curing and preparation process is also different.
However, at the end of the day, GothiaTek's website comes flat out:
such products contain compounds that may cause cancer. Much discussed are the tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNA), which can cause cancer in animals. Swedish snus contains TSNA, although in lower concentrations than in many other smokeless tobacco products
That could very well be, and it could very well be a result of whatever type of tobacco is in snus, and perhaps the curing and perparation process also lowers the TSNA levels. But TSNA still exists in Snus. A few studies showed (according to GothiaTek) that Snus doesn't cause cancer, but we don't really know much about the studies. How much Snus was used in the studies? Who was studied? For how long? How often did they Snus? Did they also drink or smoke? Were they already at risk?
Perhaps Snus is weak enough in carcinogens that there is a low risk of cancer, but it's unreasonable to say that it does not cause cancer at all.
Don't know, maybe whatever you have over there is different in some way, I know some American companies tried to get in on the Swedish snus market, but gave up rather quickly since noone liked their products.
American tobacco is strong and harsh. Tobacco from "big tobacco" companies is often full of non-tobacco additives and other crap. I can see why it wouldn't sell well on the Swedish market, although I know some tobacconists who occasionally grind snuff, and I imagine they could make a pretty decent form of Swedish snus from their tobaccos.