I did not create this thread to promote more partisan bickering, just curious what the real reason Romney is allowing himself get twisted into such a pretzel* trying to defend his tenure at Bain.
Saw an article on Google News (Slate article) which seemed to suggest it was "carried interest" (private equity firms income for managing money getting taxed at low capital gains rate, not regular income?) was what was hidden there.
And cartoon in this morning's local paper saying he was outsourcing in part to shelter income overseas.
Any other rational hypotheses others have seen or read?
* I don't care for Huffington Post at all, but this article was linked from Washington Post article I read on swing voters in Colorado (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...onomy/2012/07/13/gJQAY8qghW_blog.html?hpid=z2) seems to indicate Romney is contradicting himself http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/mitt-romney-bain-departure_n_1669006.html) for presumed political expediency.
edit: found this interesting tidbit:
Saw an article on Google News (Slate article) which seemed to suggest it was "carried interest" (private equity firms income for managing money getting taxed at low capital gains rate, not regular income?) was what was hidden there.
And cartoon in this morning's local paper saying he was outsourcing in part to shelter income overseas.
Any other rational hypotheses others have seen or read?
* I don't care for Huffington Post at all, but this article was linked from Washington Post article I read on swing voters in Colorado (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...onomy/2012/07/13/gJQAY8qghW_blog.html?hpid=z2) seems to indicate Romney is contradicting himself http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/mitt-romney-bain-departure_n_1669006.html) for presumed political expediency.
edit: found this interesting tidbit:
"Named for a historic Massachusetts coastal lighthouse, Sankaty was part of a cluster of similarly named hedge funds run by Bain Capital, the private equity firm Romney founded and led until 1999. The offshore company was used in Bain's $1 billion takeover of Domino's Pizza and other multimillion-dollar investment deals more than a decade ago.
Romney's campaign declined to answer detailed questions from AP about Sankaty. Romney aides have said in the past that some disclosures were not required because those assets were valued by his financial advisers at less than $1,000 - below the minimum threshold under federal rules set by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. A financial snapshot of Sankaty in Romney's 2010 tax returns showed the holding with almost no value at the time- with $10,000 in both assets and liabilities.
"Everything on the filings is reported as required," campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in a brief statement. "If OGE has an issue with any filings, they would let us know." The agency declined to comment.
While Sankaty no longer plays an active role in Bain's current deals, private equity experts said such holdings could provide significant income to Romney under his 10-year separation agreement from Bain, which expired in 2009. Investment funds typically churn "carried interest," profit shares due to the managers of the funds that often range as much as 20 percent of a fund's annual profit - known as "the carry." Even after investment funds are exhausted, profit shares and other late earnings from those stakes can continue to stream, arriving as lucrative "tails," tax experts say. In some circumstances, the analysts added, offshore companies like Sankaty could also offer limited tax deferral advantages.
The implications of Romney's Bain profit-sharing became clear last month when his trust reported that one rarely disclosed asset had posted a $1.9 million payout. The income was described as a "true-up" payment, catch-up income that made up for unpaid earnings owed to Romney as part of his Bain separation agreement.
Such sizable earnings are possible "depending on the terms of the agreement," said tax law expert Michael Kosnitzky, an attorney at the New York firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner. The Romney campaign acknowledged recently that it could not rule out more large future payments.
The use of offshore companies such as Sankaty is allowed under U.S. tax laws. They are typically set up as shell corporations by private equity and hedge funds to route investments from large foreign and institutional investors, such as large pension plans, into corporate takeovers. The money is used to provide equity and buy up debt. In turn, the investors gain U.S. tax advantages by passing their funds through the offshore "blocker" corporations, avoiding a high 35 percent tax on earnings that the Internal Revenue Service describes as "unrelated business income."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...COMPANY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/bain-capital-mitt-romney-outsourcing-china-global-tech
Last edited: