Chadder007
Diamond Member
Vote on poll and post why you think so please.
The biggest of all causes of car accidents is drivers who operate motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol. Thirty percent of all Americans will be involved in an alcohol related accident at some point in their lifetime. Alcohol is involved in more than forty percent of all car accidents. In 2003, more than 13,000 people lost their lives in alcohol related traffic accidents.
Causes of car accidents are often attributed to driver negligence. This is especially true for young and inexperienced drivers, though any driver can act negligently or recklessly on the road. One quarter of all car accidents involve a teenaged driver. Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of death for persons aged five to twenty-seven. Lack of experience, risk-taking behavior, distractions, and alcohol or drug use are common causes of car accidents that involve teen drivers. Reckless and aggressive driving are major causes of car accidents for any age group.
Defective auto parts, vehicle design, or car maintenance are also major causes of car accidents. Defective door latches, seat belts, airbags, seat backs, roofs, ignition systems, and fuel systems are all causes of car accidents or contributing factors in the damage that is caused in vehicle accidents. Causes of car accidents can also include overall faulty design of a motor vehicle which makes accidents and damages more likely. SUV design makes these vehicles less stable on the road and four times more likely to rollover in an accident, compared to passenger cars. When SUV design defects cause or contribute to car accidents, the manufacturer of the vehicle can be liable for damages.
Other major causes of car accidents include poor weather and unsafe road conditions. These causes of car accidents can be difficult to attribute to personal or party negligence, though other factors may have also contributed to the damages sustained in these accidents.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
This is a rigged poll.
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
This is a rigged poll.
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
The truth is that speed is dangerous because most people do not have the skill to drive well enough at high speeds.
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
This is a rigged poll.
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
The truth is that speed is dangerous because most people do not have the skill to drive well enough at high speeds.
Yeah, but it is rarely the speeder that is the cause of the accident. If anything, it is the person they are flying up behind who makes a blind lane change.
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Yeah, but it is rarely the speeder that is the cause of the accident. If anything, it is the person they are flying up behind who makes a blind lane change.
Most people don't have the skill to drive well when talking on the phone or putting on makeup, etc. so what's your gripe?Originally posted by: JLGatsby
This is a rigged poll.
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
The truth is that speed is dangerous because most people do not have the skill to drive well enough at high speeds.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Yeah, but it is rarely the speeder that is the cause of the accident. If anything, it is the person they are flying up behind who makes a blind lane change.
If that person wasn't speeding, they would be able to top quick enough to avoid the other bad driver.
Now who's fault is it? See you can twist it anyway you want.
Originally posted by: IamElectro
My biggest fear on the road are SUVs with those soccerball magnets on them.
SUV + women on cell phone + screaming demons watching Sponge Bob on the overpriced DVD player = dangerous situation
So what makes a car going 5MPH faster than another car more dangerous?Originally posted by: JLGatsby
OP: Inattentive Driving has NOTHING to do with what we were discussing and you know if you put up a poll that reflected what you really said you would look like a fool.
FACT: You said speeding is not dangerous, and most people on here, and the world disagree. You didn't say "less" dangerous, or "not the TRUE root of the problem. You said it's NOT dangerous.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
Originally posted by: Rock Hydra
I don't agree with the you can drive safely at any speed if you have the skill, because there are too many variables beyond the driver's control such as animals, loose gravel, standing water, ice, and other drivers.
Originally posted by: Rock Hydra
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
You said speeding was NOT dangerous. However others will vote for option 2 because technically a skilled driver can drive safely at any speed.
I don't agree with the you can drive safely at any speed if you have the skill, because there are too many variables beyond the driver's control such as animals, loose gravel, standing water, ice, and other drivers.
My question is not theoretical and is the context of your thread. I'm still awaiting your answer.Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Well realistically there is no one on Earth that can drive 200mph on ice safely. I'm speaking theoretically, as the OP is.Originally posted by: Rock Hydra
I don't agree with the you can drive safely at any speed if you have the skill, because there are too many variables beyond the driver's control such as animals, loose gravel, standing water, ice, and other drivers.
TECHNICALLY if your skill is good enough, you can defend against any obstacle.
But realistically, there is no one on Earth with such a skill.
I was originally thinking on realistic terms, while the OP countered me with a "theoretical" argument. His poll also encourages non-realistic thinking. His rebuttle of my original statement is invalid because it's not in the same context as mine (his is theoretically, mind is realistic).