I would assume it is a linux/klinux based machine. I have a bunch of older machines (around 90) that I could probably get running, but they are all sloooooowwwwwwww.
for intel the slowest you can get is a 386 SX, any MHz will do. 286's don't do the 32-bit instructions you need for rc5.
i don't know about alpha or motorola procs...the lower limit is 32-bit instructions though (emulated or otherwise)
I should say that I had a 386/16 running for about a month. 5K/sec which is about 15 hours for a single 2**28 work unit. This was on a simple DOS boot disk with the client exe in the autoexec.bat
I've got a 386DX 25 running Dos 6.22 which gets a little over 16Kk/s. With turbo off it gets around 5Kk/s. It's got an ISA NIC in it now, maybe I should try out Klinux on it.
I may have you all beat. I've got a 486/8MHz cracking for me. There's something wrong with its mobo, so the Turbo switch has no effect. When it's on, it submits 1-2 blocks a day.
SuperKen, it's not a waste of electricity, because it's not my computer. It's used in one office of my high school (sometimes). Since I'm not there anymore, though, I have no control over when it's on or off. But it's not wasting cycles!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.