• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What is the height at which you are no longer considered a manlet?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Manlet

  • Under 5'7"

  • Under 5'6"

  • Under 5'5"

  • 5'4" and under is definitely a manlet


Results are only viewable after voting.
Anyone shorter than this runt:

sarkozy-and-wife-bruni-hit-indian-tourist-trail-2010-12-05_l.jpg
 
He only "gets" women because they want his money.

Women are only actually sexually attracted to men over 6'. If they're with a guy shorter than that it's because a. they can't attract a non-manlet or b. they want to steal his gold. However they can never be sexually satisfied with a man unless he is over 6'.

And women will only find you attractive for your height. No money. No personality. No penis.
 
I'm 6 foot and my gf is 4' 11"

She always makes me feel pedo by saying she's the same size as most middle schoolers.
 
Uh, did you forget posting that pic of you standing next to the Lotus?
You weren't 5' 11" in that.
Have a growth spurt? :biggrin:

BTW, I WAS 5'-10" when discharged from the military, now am at 5'-8" to 5-9 1/2", depending on Barometric pressure & how long I've been on my feet.
Degenerative Disk Disease, FTL.

And I voted "Under 5'-4"", though I don't judge people by their height (Maybe by their weight, though! LOL)

Dude...you're going in the wrong direction...

I was less than 5'-8" when I was discharged...I'm now just a skosh under 6'-1" for the same reasons you're shrinking...degenerative disk disease, bad knee cartilage, etc.
 
Ahh, but conversely, since women look for a tall man, if you can convince one taller than you to go for you, you must be manly indeed.

Also - I've never heard of the term "manlet" before this thread, and it sounds suspiciously "jersey shore", which makes me scoff at anyone who uses the term.

Deeko's tall wife is delicious and he makes a good point.
 
Uh, did you forget posting that pic of you standing next to the Lotus?
You weren't 5' 11" in that.
Have a growth spurt? :biggrin:

BTW, I WAS 5'-10" when discharged from the military, now am at 5'-8" to 5-9 1/2", depending on Barometric pressure & how long I've been on my feet.
Degenerative Disk Disease, FTL.

And I voted "Under 5'-4"", though I don't judge people by their height (Maybe by their weight, though! LOL)

I'm 5'11" barefoot and I can assure you that I am 5'11" in that picture too.

I don't judge people by their height either. I just thought the term manlet was funny. :biggrin:
 
I'm 6 foot and my gf is 4' 11"

She always makes me feel pedo by saying she's the same size as most middle schoolers.

I'm 6'1", and had a GF in college that was probably 4'10" and 90 pounds after a good meal. But damn if she wasn't fun as hell if you know what I mean. I liked to call her "spinner" lol. :awe:

Ironically she was two years older than me and my beer buyer. But she did not come across or look like she was underage, she was somewhat sensitive to that. Short womenz need lovin too!
 
FBB got laid?? Must've missed that thread :awe: I thought a couple of years ago he was with a chick but he couldn't get it up (I don't think that counts :hmm🙂

I frequent ATOT less than you and I know he got laid. wtfiswrongwithyou

I'm going to say anything under 5'6" is definite manlet territory.

Anyone at the 5'6" range has got it tough. 5'7" as well. 5'9" is when you start to reach respectable levels. (Cough, I'm almost 5'9". Go being a midget... Whatever, most bitches are short anyway. Makes it just less awkward talking to them.)
 
Back
Top