• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

what is the difference for this?

.09 is the better chip. and the "weird u thing" is the symbol for micron which is to say the size of the manuf process, the smaller the better since the lower the micron the less heat
 
Neither If your going with (2) 6800GT why would you put that slow of a CPU on it?
Check arround but from the posts and benchmarks I read even a FX55 cannot come close to running them check out the Benchmarks for doom3 and HL2 at 1200X1600 the CPU is already the bottleneck some reviews state that the FX55 cannot run even the 6800GT much less 6800Ultra or ATI's X800 GPU to its fullest. Are you running (4) high res monitors for video editing? maybe full HDTV stream editing? If your going for that much editing or multitasking you will need 2 Gig of ram for sure. Look around, you maybe better off spending the extra $400 on a CPU upgrade.
 
i dont plan to oc and i wont b gettin both 6800s for a while im goin with single 660 then when the 6800s get down to about 200 ill get them then. and there is no way i can afford a fx-55 i only have $1000 to spend at the moment for a new comp.
 
For sure stick with th .09nm Winne. Its up to you I am very happy with my 3500+
If your going to OC Dough is right 3200+ seems to be the chip at this time.
 
whcih 3500 do u have? just curious

so i should go witht the 3200 tht has a 90nm instead of the 3500 with the .13um
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top