I am sure it's all more or less horsesh!t.. but it doesen't appear that way, so I've found it interesting... or something.Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Eli
Finally, someone with a brain.. hehOriginally posted by: Descartes
Cat owners prefer cats, and dog owners prefer dogs. That is the only qualitative difference. For every perceived archetypal cat owner I am certain you will find one completely the opposite.
I think establishing behavioral dichotomies such as these on such superficial relationships is far too akin to pseudoscientific manifestations of the same (e.g. astrology). No, a Pisces has no archetype, and neither does someone who has a preference towards a certain animal companion.
If you disagree with me then I'll establish the dichotomy of ignoramus and rationalist 🙂
Although, I acually find astrology quite interesting...... It's a little more complicated than "You're a Pisces, so you're this way." It gets way more in depth than that; it's dependant on the sign that all the plants were in, not just your main sign.
😉
I find astronomy much more interesting, but I appreciate astrology for its historical influence and not necessarily its implied influence on animal (particularly human) behavior.
:beer: