What is the difference between believing in Aliens and believing in God?

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
"...As an admirer of moonlight I resent the bossy insistence of those who want to reduce my time for enjoying it. At the back of the Daylight Saving scheme I detect the bony, blue-fingered hand of Puritanism, eager to push people into bed earlier, and get them up earlier, to make them healthy, wealthy and wise in spite of themselves." (Robertson Davies, The Diary of Samuel Marchbanks, 1947, XIX, Sunday.)
Love your sig. That is awesome. :thumbsup:
 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: Vic
"...As an admirer of moonlight I resent the bossy insistence of those who want to reduce my time for enjoying it. At the back of the Daylight Saving scheme I detect the bony, blue-fingered hand of Puritanism, eager to push people into bed earlier, and get them up earlier, to make them healthy, wealthy and wise in spite of themselves." (Robertson Davies, The Diary of Samuel Marchbanks, 1947, XIX, Sunday.)
Love your sig. That is awesome. :thumbsup:


Thx
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: cquark
I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate." No one can demonstrate that P != NP. All they can do is observe that no one has proven P=NP.
Those cryptographic techniques appear to work, do they not?
And what does that prove that P=NP?
 

wchou

Banned
Dec 1, 2004
1,137
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Spencer278
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Spencer278
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Spencer278
There is no difference between alien life and life on earth except location.
And you know this... how?
What the hell do you think extraterrestrial means. That is the very definition of alien life that doesn't come from earth.
No... how do you know what you said in your statement, that "there is no difference between alien life and life on earth except location". For all we know, if alien life were to be discovered, it could be so different from life on earth that we might not even recognize it as life.
And yet if the very same life was found on earth it wouldn't be alien. The only thing making some life alien and some life not alien is location.
If you can't argue the topic, then segue right out it eh?

It doesn't take faith to believe in life on earth. We can observe it. The same thing cannot be said of alien life.

Clearly this thread is dead.

Clearly this thread is dead
Clearly this thread is dead
 

Brazen

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2000
4,259
0
0
It's interesting the people who say you can not prove God's existence, but you can prove aliens exist, and then use some form of Drake's (ie. using probability as proof) to backup their claim.

When if anything, Drake's and the current state of abiogenesis (which Drake's hinges on) research points more towards the existence of God. To put it simply, if abiogenesis is possible, then aliens are possible but not probable and God is still possible; however, if abiogenesis does not exist then God is not only possible but NECESSARY.

Given a 50/50 chance for abiogenesis even being possible, the odds are better off believing in God over aliens (using the alien-believers reasoning), however, so far all data has pointed towards abiogenesis as NOT being possible.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: cquark
I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate." No one can demonstrate that P != NP. All they can do is observe that no one has proven P=NP.
Those cryptographic techniques appear to work, do they not?
And what does that prove that P=NP?
I'm not trying to prove anything.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: cquark
I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate." No one can demonstrate that P != NP. All they can do is observe that no one has proven P=NP.
Those cryptographic techniques appear to work, do they not?
And what does that prove that P=NP?
I'm not trying to prove anything.
Please elaborate on what you meant by your comment then.
 

Brazen

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2000
4,259
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Infohawk
No. I am not agreeing with you. Read closer. Attack pigs != all alien life. There is some evidence for aliens generally. I probably should have used another example. Replace pigs with chevrolets. The point is that it's not unreasonable to NOT believe in something for which there is no evidence. As others have tried to point out to you, there IS some evidence (even if it is not conclusive and not evidence as the 100% type of evidence) that alien life would exist.

And appreciating faith is fine, but attacking basic logical principles is not.
Sorry, aliens = attack pigs. There is NO more evidence for alien life than there is for attack pigs (lovely hedge there). Attacking basic logical principles is thinking that you can change your argument simply by changing the level of absurdness.

And while you might think it not unreasonable, it is still illogical to believe or not believe in something for which there is absolutely no evidence, either for or against. You are still expressing a belief, even if that belief is in the negative. The only logical answer is to say, "I don't know." Because otherwise, you can switch the question around positive and negative at your leisure and amusement, and that gets even more absurd. The only absence of belief is not to have any belief whatsoever, neither positive or negative.

I dont' know, Vic.... If he comes back with a few more negatives....
The point is that it's not unreasonable to NOT believe in something for which there is no evidence
...I think he'll pwn you. :laugh:
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: cquark
I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate." No one can demonstrate that P != NP. All they can do is observe that no one has proven P=NP.
Those cryptographic techniques appear to work, do they not?
And what does that prove that P=NP?
I'm not trying to prove anything.
Please elaborate on what you meant by your comment then.
My argument is not dependent on P=NP being solved or not solved.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: cquark
I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate." No one can demonstrate that P != NP. All they can do is observe that no one has proven P=NP.
Those cryptographic techniques appear to work, do they not?
And what does that prove that P=NP?
I'm not trying to prove anything.
Please elaborate on what you meant by your comment then.
My argument is not dependent on P=NP being solved or not solved.
Are you kidding me? That is what your argument is all about.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Vic
My argument is not dependent on P=NP being solved or not solved.
Are you kidding me? That is what your argument is all about.
No, it's not. On the basis of decades of observation and working principle, P != NP. That is a far cry from a complete absence of a useful quantity and quality of experiment on the existence of aliens or a God.
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
so to summarize, believing in God is the same level as believing in UFOs, grays and anal probes.
 

supersloth

Senior member
Apr 19, 2005
270
0
0
how can you say there's no evidence in God, this world is enought evidence for me, life just doesn't create itself and here's my crazy logic behind that.

the probabilty of me randomly picking my fake first and last name, "turd ferguson" out of a hat of 26 letters is 1 out of 95428956661682176. (pm me if you want me to show you the math)

so, if i can't even pick my freaking name out of a hat in my life time, then how in the world did this Universe create itself. nuf said

supersloth
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: supersloth
how can you say there's no evidence in God, this world is enought evidence for me, life just doesn't create itself and here's my crazy logic behind that.

the probabilty of me randomly picking my fake first and last name, "turd ferguson" out of a hat of 26 letters is 1 out of 95428956661682176. (pm me if you want me to show you the math)

so, if i can't even pick my freaking name out of a hat in my life time, then how in the world did this Universe create itself. nuf said

supersloth
This is easily the greatest first post I've ever seen here, simply based on the use of the ubiquitous alias "Turd Ferguson", let alone the statistical arguments that follow. :beer: and welcome to AT P&N!
 
S

SlitheryDee

I guess if you want to simplify the situation, Most of us don't have PERSONAL
experience with either divinity of any form or extraterrestrial life, yet a large portion of us believe in one or both anyway. A significant portion of those who believe that alien life exists
don't have the knowledge or even have the inclination to gain the knowledge that would allow them to prove/disprove their beliefs. I guess that could be called faith. The vast majority of those who believe that god(s) exist in some form or another believe that the existence of he/she/it/they (GOD) are beyond proving or disproving. I'd say this is definitely faith. The fact that some people fall into both groups is interesting indeed.

I think that there are definite similarities here...
 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: supersloth
how can you say there's no evidence in God, this world is enought evidence for me, life just doesn't create itself and here's my crazy logic behind that.

the probabilty of me randomly picking my fake first and last name, "turd ferguson" out of a hat of 26 letters is 1 out of 95428956661682176. (pm me if you want me to show you the math)

so, if i can't even pick my freaking name out of a hat in my life time, then how in the world did this Universe create itself. nuf said

supersloth


Because your lifetime and mine and the lifetime of the oldest person in the bible multiplied by 1000 is not even a drop in the bucket compared to the age of the universe. Given enough time and energy all sorts of neat stuff can happen.

 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
Originally posted by: Brazen
It's interesting the people who say you can not prove God's existence, but you can prove aliens exist, and then use some form of Drake's (ie. using probability as proof) to backup their claim.

When if anything, Drake's and the current state of abiogenesis (which Drake's hinges on) research points more towards the existence of God. To put it simply, if abiogenesis is possible, then aliens are possible but not probable and God is still possible; however, if abiogenesis does not exist then God is not only possible but NECESSARY.

Given a 50/50 chance for abiogenesis even being possible, the odds are better off believing in God over aliens (using the alien-believers reasoning), however, so far all data has pointed towards abiogenesis as NOT being possible.


Best post ive read so far.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Well, there really is a difference. For starters, we KNOW empirically that there is life on Earth, for example. We also know that there are bazillions of stars, planets, etc., in the universe, with certainly SOME possibility of an earth-type planet existing somewhere out there. The fact that we KNOW life exists here on earth provides some basis for believing that there MAY be life on other planets.

Jason
Drake equation again. This has been addressed repeatedly in this thread. If I flip a coin and get heads 1 million times in a row, that does not increase the probability that the next flip will be tails.

I didn't say it did, and it's NOT the drake equation, you apparently misunderstand the concept. I didn't say a WORD about it being "probable" that there was life on another planet based on the fact that life exists on earth, just that it is POSSIBLE.

In any case, the existence of LIFE is a proven fact, the existence of GOD is not. Infer what you will from that.

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Spencer278
There is no difference between alien life and life on earth except location.
And you know this... how?


OK, this is getting absurd. Life=life, OK? Whether plant or animal, intelligent or non intelligent, for the sake of argument let's just assume we mean that something is ALIVE. Whether its intelligent and could make its way here is immaterial for the sake of this argument.

Jason
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,735
6,759
126
Belief in God is nice because it's nice to think we can live forever.

Belief in Aliens is nice because it reduces the guilt we all unconsciously feel about the otherwise really sad fact of our also unconscious desire we are hell bent on fulfilling, to destroy ourselves. This unconscious wish, though many would deny its existence, is clearly expressed via projection in all religious end time scenarios.

We must die to come alive, but we chose real death over psychic death of the ego because we fear the latter more. It is this vicarious need for death that will kill us.

Only knowledge can save us and knowledge is the last thing we want.

You will now rationalize away the fact that you were told and dismiss this information as utter tripe. It will be as if it never existed.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
But he made Adam and Eve in his own image. That would be a problem with most people I think.

As far as conversion, look what happened when the Old World discovered the New World. We just had to save those primitives. If the aliens are more advanced then us, they might insist on converting us, lol.
It might be a problem with some people by I don't think most. No one really knows what is meant by "image". I don't believe in the literal Creation, but either to believe or disbelieve requires faith (listen carefully, Infohawk), so I try to keep my knowledge in that regard to what I can truthfully observe to be factual.

And yeah, I thought about mentioning the greater likelihood of aliens converting us. :p

It seems we are close, if not the same in our philosophy of religion. I for one can't understand athiests and don't believe that we are all nothing but some sort of a fluke chemical reaction or people who beleive the bible literally. I still believe there is an unseen purpose for for our lives and some type of reckoning at the end of of it. I can't be sure of it, but I can't disprove it either.

I have said that I don't believe in "organized" religions. What I mean by that is I don't believe in religions that claim they are the one, true religion. They can't prove that they are either, so everybody should decide what the truth is based on their own observations. I think religion is and should be an evolving belief system. To let others tell you what to believe is to let others control you.

Some people seem to need someone tell them what to believe and that's fine with me, just don't try and condem me or force your views on me. I have my own thoughts on the matter, thank you very much.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
In any case, the existence of LIFE is a proven fact, the existence of GOD is not. Infer what you will from that.
This is actually the crux of the entire debate. It comes down to which mechanism of life's origins you prescribe to - abiogenesis or creation. Neither of these have been directly observed, thus believing in either is simply faith in one theory instead of the other. However, it is possible to believe in both.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
In any case, the existence of LIFE is a proven fact, the existence of GOD is not. Infer what you will from that.
This is actually the crux of the entire debate. It comes down to which mechanism of life's origins you prescribe to - abiogenesis or creation. Neither of these have been directly observed, thus believing in either is simply faith in one theory instead of the other. However, it is possible to believe in both.
Not having directly observed something doesn't mean it's pure faith to assert that life on earth formed from some amino acid mix.

Geez...give it up, already.