OK - Now since this is a touchy subject - NO FLAMING - NO TROLLING - ONLY REAL DISCUSSION PLEASE!!!
********************
Gay sex cannot be adultery, court rules
<snip>
If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court on Friday said no.
</snip>
OK, now seriously - I'm confused. Now how can having homosexual "sex" outside a "marriage"(or "union") not be considered adultery? I thought homosexual "rights" activists wanted equality - how does this help them? It doesn't make sense that they shouldn't be held to the same "adultery" laws....why does the "act" differ just because it's a homosexual act? I thought this whole "gay" issue was about putting them under the same set of laws as "straight" people.
Most know where I stand on this issue, but this ruling confuses me since it seems that a trend was reversed kind of. The "liberal" judges said it wasn't "adultery" - yet they(maybe not them specifically though) want "equal" rights. It seems to me that if Homosexuality wants "equal" rights then they have to abide and be ruled by ALL of the same laws that Heterosexuals abide by - meaning that if someone "strays" from the monogamous relationship in ANY sexual way -it should be considered "adultery", no?
CkG
********************
Gay sex cannot be adultery, court rules
<snip>
If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court on Friday said no.
</snip>
OK, now seriously - I'm confused. Now how can having homosexual "sex" outside a "marriage"(or "union") not be considered adultery? I thought homosexual "rights" activists wanted equality - how does this help them? It doesn't make sense that they shouldn't be held to the same "adultery" laws....why does the "act" differ just because it's a homosexual act? I thought this whole "gay" issue was about putting them under the same set of laws as "straight" people.
Most know where I stand on this issue, but this ruling confuses me since it seems that a trend was reversed kind of. The "liberal" judges said it wasn't "adultery" - yet they(maybe not them specifically though) want "equal" rights. It seems to me that if Homosexuality wants "equal" rights then they have to abide and be ruled by ALL of the same laws that Heterosexuals abide by - meaning that if someone "strays" from the monogamous relationship in ANY sexual way -it should be considered "adultery", no?
CkG