boxleitnerb
Platinum Member
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,605
- 6
- 81
That is one way to waste all this processing power. I sure hope you use those DP capabilities 24/7.I play at 1080p with Titan SLI.
SGSSAA, downsampling, AO (now HBAO+) are my friends![]()
I think he already did, at least the Hawaii based dual card, its called Vesuvius and he claimed to have tested itThat is one way to waste all this processing power. I sure hope you use those DP capabilities 24/7.
There are rumors of double GPU cards based on Hawaii and gk110. That will be nice to see. Maybe sushi can say more about this?![]()
That is one way to waste all this processing power. I sure hope you use those DP capabilities 24/7.
If you buy a 780, I do hope you don't play @ 1080p.
All of this; if you're even thinking of spending more than $300 on a GPU, you should be spending twice that on a halfway decent display. I sometimes don't understand people's (lack of) priorities.I was thinking this as well. 1080p doesn't need SLI or a 780 level GPU at all. I can sort of understand why you may want that performance but it's truly buying more than what is necessary IMO.
These are high end cards, they don't have to do nothing because you said it yourself, Titan is still faster. Don't see what they have to do.
Stop talking about Mantle, it won't "pan out" because its a niche product that is not even proven yet, it has to many question marks. Remember its the same card they put true audio on..so that pretty much answers that question.
99x'Existing Nvidia GPUs are competitive with AMDs offerings, so across-the-board price adjustments would probably be enough.
I was thinking this as well. 1080p doesn't need SLI or a 780 level GPU at all. I can sort of understand why you may want that performance but it's truly buying more than what is necessary IMO.
It won't pan out? It's already in Bf4 which is really the only game that matters.
BF3 performance is basically the sole reason nvidia outsold AMD this last generation. If the r9 290x is faster in bf4 by a substantial amount it will be huge for AMD.
99x'
But looking at the 290x's suggests NV's high end won't be
99x'
But looking at the 290x's suggests NV's high end won't be
So the question is How is Nvidia going to counter
That is one way to waste all this processing power. I sure hope you use those DP capabilities 24/7.
That said, nvidia will counter as they always have.
Already BF4! ITS TAKING OFF ALREADY! I heard the trueaudio is going to make every developer stop making its games and start from scratch for it! They are releasing 100s of games just for it. Seriously who buys into this crap reasoning?
I really don't think you understand how much a game like BF4 can move hardware. If Mantle works as advertised and AMD is much faster because of it in BF4 cards will fly off the shelves.
If they go full GK110, I'm assuming they'll do it as a 785/Geforce card, right ? Not another 'dual-purpose' over-priced madness card... If their response to a $600 R290X doing in Titan is to just release a Titan Ultra with a 5-10% lead for $1000 again... That will do nothing to sway most potential R290X buyers.
I'm expecting 780 to get a price cut and maybe a 785 type card that uses a Titan core with 3GB VRAM.
A 28nm Maxwell, while interesting, is not going to make any waves performance wise. I think they're at the threshold of what they can do on the same node. Even Intel only manages about a 10% improvement when they switch architectures on the same node. Also dealing with the same node they can't do another 3XX mm2 28nm Maxwell for a high end card like they did with the 680. That is going to be slower than 780/Titan. They'll have to go big to even get those tiny possible gains over what they have right now using 28nm again.
I really don't think you understand how much a game like BF4 can move hardware. If Mantle works as advertised and AMD is much faster because of it in BF4 cards will fly off the shelves.