Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: chr6
i dont get it
Originally posted by: chr6
i dont get it
Originally posted by: shady06
ahhhh, go over to hardocp and read the all the slides
Originally posted by: chr6
i dont get it
Originally posted by: klah
Originally posted by: chr6
i dont get it
NV leaked their 6600 vs. x700 "internal" presentation last week, so ATI has prepared these to counter.
Originally posted by: Rage187
Originally posted by: chr6
i dont get it
Ati claims they have superior performance in todays games, and that benchmarks mean nothing.
Yet, as most sites have proven, the 6600 beats it in real world game testing.
In the end they are just trying to misinform the average user/buyer/retailer.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
How can they claim that the X700 is faster than the 6600GT in Far Cry? Even at HardOCP they admitted that the GT was faster.
On top of that, they're downplaying the importance of Doom 3 benchmarks, when that game is arguably the most important benchmark that will be released within the next two years.
Originally posted by: Insomniak
ATi's FUD vs. NV's FUD
Is there something new here that I missed?
Originally posted by: Rage187
I hope the Ati fanbois heard their god and savor say that "BENCHMARKS DO NOT MATTER". Remember that before posting any 3dmark05 scores.
