Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
If things are structurally flawed do you throw them out or fix them so they work as intended?
Democracy's 'structural flaws' cannot be fixed. Mass franchise democracy will always be mired in perpetual corruption and outrageous laws.
People have been talking about 'fixing' our democracy for decades. Read my lips: it will never happen.
Trying to 'fix' mass franchise democracy is like trying to fix the Titanic on its way down. The ship is sunk and now it's time to throw democracy into the wastebasket of history.
The term mass franchise democracy means nothing to me. Care to elaborate on the types and meanings of democracies?
The phrase is pretty easy to understand.
Mass:
A large but nonspecific amount or number (of people)
Franchise:
A privilege or right officially granted a person or a group by a government, especially:
The constitutional or statutory right to vote.
Democracy:
Majority rule.
So we have a huge mass of people (in the U.S. 18 and older non-felons) with the 'right' to vote in a 'majority rule' system. And of course there is nothing these voters cannot vote on. Everything is up for grabs.
What do you think will be the result of such a system? What do you think
has been the result of such a system?
I can give you the answer as to what generally has been the result:
The unabated growth of warfare, welfare and regulations on a massive scale.
Cliff notes:
Mass franchise democracy is I piss in your Cheerios, you piss in mine and the government extorts from us its Cheerios tax for granting us the 'priviledge' of pissing in each other's Cheerios.