What is a good free cd mp3 ripper to use?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dman

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
9,110
0
76
EAC is kludgy and slow, but, it works.

Not free, but, AudioCatalyst is much faster at ripping and encoding w/ same quality settings.

I blame it on LAME mostly... just my experience. Could be I'm not using an optomized version of LAME or something.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: dman
EAC is kludgy and slow, but, it works.

Not free, but, AudioCatalyst is much faster at ripping and encoding w/ same quality settings.

I blame it on LAME mostly... just my experience. Could be I'm not using an optomized version of LAME or something.

EAC slow and kludgy? It flies on my dual XP1800+ :)
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
CDEX fo sho.. excellent software, has all the right codecs, (LAME).. and its free.

there is nothing else :D
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
EAC is kludgy and slow, but, it works.

Not free, but, AudioCatalyst is much faster at ripping and encoding w/ same quality settings.

I blame it on LAME mostly... just my experience. Could be I'm not using an optomized version of LAME or something.

Get some higher quality speakers and you'll notice that AudioCatalyst totally screws up the higher end of the audio spectrum. It basically adds noise.

AudioGrabber is the program to use so you can still use the Lame ENC.. But, no way in hell you should be recommending AudioCatalyst to anyone. I don't care if you have it set at 320kbps and HQ, it will put noise in it.

Horrible recommendation. Who cares if it only takes 35 seconds to rip an entire CD if the entire CD sounds sh!tty.