• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What if?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: OCguy
What do you think of my impression of the first post in the thread had it been started by Spaceman and rolomather's love child:



What if Hitler
those jews he liked
Bad guy was not
would we have done it
Click to expand...

:laugh:
 
What if gravity alternated every day, or if the electromagnetic spectrum would randomly mix itself up? My guess is a universe where Spaceman makes sense, time travel is possible, and Rolomather sticks to posting Youtube comments where he belongs...
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?
Click to expand...

What if you weren't a raging partisan hack? 😛
Click to expand...

More like, what if there was actually a human that was bi-partisan?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure there are, it just doesn't look like it from waaaay over to the right where you are 😛
Click to expand...

I am right in the middle. You are so far left you think i am "waaay over on the right."
 
Originally posted by: RoloMather
What if Hitler and the Nazi didn't do the Holocaust? Let imagine Hitler to be a nice guy who wanted the best for his country. Imagine the Nazi did everything that they did in WW2 like try to take over Europe but instead of the killing of Jews and other races they didn't do any of that.

How would history judge Hitler and the Nazi?
Click to expand...

1. Hitler may not have gotten the support he did without a hate group.

2. He may have been treated as a liberator by most of Eastern Europe, giving him the forces to fight Stalin.

3. Britain and France may not have been so quick to condemn Hitler's actions if he was in some way nicer. Britain and maybe France possibly would have avoided war. (though they didn't know he was killing people at first, but if he went in as a liberator against communism they may have let it pass)
Otherwise, history would have played out the same but Hitler would have some more Eastern European manpower. He still would have lost, but may have held out longer and taken more territory, possibly causing the US to nuke Berlin or some other city.
 
Originally posted by: Fox5
Originally posted by: RoloMather
What if Hitler and the Nazi didn't do the Holocaust? Let imagine Hitler to be a nice guy who wanted the best for his country. Imagine the Nazi did everything that they did in WW2 like try to take over Europe but instead of the killing of Jews and other races they didn't do any of that.

How would history judge Hitler and the Nazi?
Click to expand...

1. Hitler may not have gotten the support he did without a hate group.

2. He may have been treated as a liberator by most of Eastern Europe, giving him the forces to fight Stalin.

3. Britain and France may not have been so quick to condemn Hitler's actions if he was in some way nicer. Britain and maybe France possibly would have avoided war. (though they didn't know he was killing people at first, but if he went in as a liberator against communism they may have let it pass)
Otherwise, history would have played out the same but Hitler would have some more Eastern European manpower. He still would have lost, but may have held out longer and taken more territory, possibly causing the US to nuke Berlin or some other city.
Click to expand...

4. Text
 
Eh. You know Hitler didn't just go after the Jews, right?

Let's add...

Gays
Gypsies
Minorities
Sick/Handicapped/Infirm
Those deemed to be "non-Aryan" in general
Political Dissidents

...goes on and on.
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
I am right in the middle. You are so far left you think i am "waaay over on the right."
Click to expand...

Now I KNOW you aren't that self-deluded 😛
Click to expand...

yea, right wing facist i am
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

try it. let's see how leftist you are.

I took it again for shits and giggles, got the same
Click to expand...

You're too far north.

Here is where I am. I'm all about both economic AND social freedom:

http://www.politicalcompass.or...raph?ec=7.88&soc=-3.49
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
I am right in the middle. You are so far left you think i am "waaay over on the right."
Click to expand...

Now I KNOW you aren't that self-deluded 😛
Click to expand...

yea, right wing facist i am
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

try it. let's see how leftist you are.

I took it again for shits and giggles, got the same
Click to expand...

Sure thing
Click to expand...

What's wrong with economic freedom?
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
I am right in the middle. You are so far left you think i am "waaay over on the right."
Click to expand...

Now I KNOW you aren't that self-deluded 😛
Click to expand...

yea, right wing facist i am
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

try it. let's see how leftist you are.

I took it again for shits and giggles, got the same
Click to expand...

Sure thing
Click to expand...

What's wrong with economic freedom?
Click to expand...

People like him want social "freedom" at the expense of economic freedom. E.g. they would consider healthcare a social "right" and would be willing to detriment economic freedom to do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top