What if Saddam Hussein sent the UN inspectors to the US?

[Koing]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: edro13
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.

Because, lately, we haven't used any WMD's on our own citizens or our neighbors, and the only time we did, we were in a world war with the other side.

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
They better not check my pants

Rumor has it, all they'd find is a missle silo -- you know -- a big empty storage place.

LOL.

Also the americans didn't use biological weapons on neighbouring coutries.

Ms Crow is a bit tit for that t shirt. More bs from people who don't know........

 

[idNut]

Originally posted by: idNut
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

 

[AlienCraft]

We would be in Bizarro World. Everything would be backwards...

 

[AZGamer]

Originally posted by: HappyPuppy

Originally posted by: BlinderBomber Iraqi inspectors would look around the White Sands range, and some of our other larger military establishments, see the large piles of WMDs and Nuclear warheads... then they would hitail it back to Iraq and pray we never even thought about attacking them.

Wrong. They would run to Kofi Anan and demand that the U.N. send its crack troops in to disarm us. We would, of course, comply out of fear that we would be occupied, our government dissolved and a socialist republic set up in its place. Oh, wait, we already have the Democrats trying to do that to us.

There would be a military coup d'etat if anyone attempted to forcefully send in troops and the President complied.

Heck, the UN tried to send in people to inspect our prisons when they have no real authority to do so, needless to say, it didn't happen. Even liberals see the light once in a while.

 

[AZGamer]

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

We have nukes.

We'll fire them before we give them up.

We are the dominant military power.

If they try to take us, we'll ruin the world 3x over with radiation before we disarm.

I'd have it no other way - the blood of tyrants and patriots may be spilled for true freedom.

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: edro13

Originally posted by: nachiketa1
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.

You kind of said this as a joke.....but it is true. What are the U.N. inspectors doing there? They are searching every military base in the country. Do British inspectors search Area 51 for illegal nukes?

Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Iraq lost the Gulf War, in the cease fire agreement they signed they agreeed to disarm all chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

N. Korea in 1994 signed a treaty agreeing that they would not develop nuclear weapons in exhange for food and oil. They broke that treaty.

 

[HappyPuppy]

Originally posted by: Geekbabe
all the UN inspectors would need to do is come to ATOT and check out all the lilttle pus pockets stored here,they'd sanction us in a heartbeat.

I like you more and more all the time.

 

[ResidentIdiot]

Originally posted by: Tabb
Damn, it would take forever considering how big the States are. I could really care less if we do have WMD's, we have nukes. Even if we do have bio/chem we don't have a crazy leader with his finger over the big red button.

Bush is a little war monger. I bet he sits all day stroking his red button. :disgust:

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: ResidentIdiot

Originally posted by: Tabb
Damn, it would take forever considering how big the States are. I could really care less if we do have WMD's, we have nukes. Even if we do have bio/chem we don't have a crazy leader with his finger over the big red button.

Bush is a little war monger. I bet he sits all day stroking his red button. :disgust:

Well, your name fits you.

 

[HappyPuppy]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: ResidentIdiot

Originally posted by: Tabb
Damn, it would take forever considering how big the States are. I could really care less if we do have WMD's, we have nukes. Even if we do have bio/chem we don't have a crazy leader with his finger over the big red button.

Bush is a little war monger. I bet he sits all day stroking his red button. :disgust:

Well, your name fits you.

Agreed. He also knows how to stroke it.

 

[ResidentIdiot]

Originally posted by: AZGamer

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

We have nukes.

We'll fire them before we give them up.

We are the dominant military power.

If they try to take us, we'll ruin the world 3x over with radiation before we disarm.

I'd have it no other way - the blood of tyrants and patriots may be spilled for true freedom.

Get your head out of your arse!

 

[HappyPuppy]

Originally posted by: ResidentIdiot

Originally posted by: AZGamer

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

We have nukes.

We'll fire them before we give them up.

We are the dominant military power.

If they try to take us, we'll ruin the world 3x over with radiation before we disarm.

I'd have it no other way - the blood of tyrants and patriots may be spilled for true freedom.

Get your head out of your arse!

Would you care to expound on your statement? I see nothing wrong with the post you seem to object to.

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

Does the fact that a teacher does not seem to have a clue as to world history and the politics of the last 60 years bother anyone else.

idNut, it is a stupid question. Please do this. Research the history of WWII. Do some research on the Manhattan project. Then move onto Stalin and the Cold War and the concept of MAD(mutally assured destruction). When you can discuss those topics with some knowledge, then come back and ask your question again.

 

[ResidentIdiot]

How could you justify "we'll ruin the world 3x over with radiation before we disarm". What would give you the right to do this? Your military superiority?

 

[HappyPuppy]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

Does the fact that a teacher does not seem to have a clue as to world history and the politics of the last 60 years bother anyone else.

idNut, it is a stupid question. Please do this. Research the history of WWII. Do some research on the Manhattan project. Then move onto Stalin and the Cold War and the concept of MAD(mutally assured destruction). When you can discuss those topics with some knowledge, then come back and ask your question again.

These children have been brainwashed since birth by liberals willing to appease at any cost. I fear you are preaching to a wall when you try to reason with them.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

Because good teachers always ask questions - it provokes thought. However, your teacher should not have left the question as he/she did. You might want to do a little more research as suggested - but, then take the answer back to your teacher and get some bonus points.

 

[jjones]

Originally posted by: idNut

Originally posted by: idNut
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Anyone know this?

We are not "allowed" to have these weapons. We have them, period. Iraq, when it lost the Gulf War, made agreements that it would not develop such weapons and it is required that they do not, exactly because of stated loss of war. North Korea can have all of the weapons it wants. They did sign a treaty not to develop them in exchange for assistance, which they recently broke. We can choose, along with other nations, to view N.K. as a pariah nation now and do all of the wonderful things within our power to make life difficult for them.

As far as I know, it is not "illegal" or "not allowed" that other nations have nukes. India has them, Pakistan has them, Israel has them, Iran is trying to develop them, etc. All of these nations can be looked upon as potential trouble spots but they are certainly under no obligation, loosely speaking, to not develop these weapons. We, and other like-minded nations, can choose to deal with that situation as we see fit through various means of applied political and economic pressure.

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: edro13

Originally posted by: nachiketa1
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.

You kind of said this as a joke.....but it is true. What are the U.N. inspectors doing there? They are searching every military base in the country. Do British inspectors search Area 51 for illegal nukes?

Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Iraq lost the Gulf War, in the cease fire agreement they signed they agreeed to disarm all chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

N. Korea in 1994 signed a treaty agreeing that they would not develop nuclear weapons in exhange for food and oil. They broke that treaty.

Actually I was not quite correct. N. Korea had agreed earlier to not develop nuclear weapons

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT
1985 -- December 12 NORTH KOREA JOINS NPT

North Korea (DPRK) formally accedes to the NPT and agrees to open a new 30- megawatt research reactor facility to IAEA inspections and safeguards.


edro13, Look around this site, you might learn something.
ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS


HP, I'm stubborn. I have also found that many of these posters react to facts like the wicked witch of the west did to water. They scream and disapear into nothingness.

 

[wfbberzerker]

the us gets to have weapons because:
-we used em first
-we're the biggest
-we're the baddest
-we have the most
-who on earth is gonna tell us no have and have the balls to back it up?

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
They better not check my pants

biological weapons, eh?

 

[HappyPuppy]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: edro13

Originally posted by: nachiketa1
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.

You kind of said this as a joke.....but it is true. What are the U.N. inspectors doing there? They are searching every military base in the country. Do British inspectors search Area 51 for illegal nukes?

Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Iraq lost the Gulf War, in the cease fire agreement they signed they agreeed to disarm all chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

N. Korea in 1994 signed a treaty agreeing that they would not develop nuclear weapons in exhange for food and oil. They broke that treaty.

Actually I was not quite correct. N. Korea had agreed earlier to not develop nuclear weapons

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT
1985 -- December 12 NORTH KOREA JOINS NPT

North Korea (DPRK) formally accedes to the NPT and agrees to open a new 30- megawatt research reactor facility to IAEA inspections and safeguards.


edro13, Look around this site, you might learn something.
ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS


HP, I'm stubborn. I have also found that many of these posters react to facts like the wicked witch of the west did to water. They scream and disapear into nothingness.

Thanks for the chuckle.

 

[edro]

O

I feel even more retarded now.....

Thanks for the links!