What if Saddam Hussein sent the UN inspectors to the US?

ISAslot

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2001
2,890
108
106
You're going to have to set this up a bit more because it makes no sense reversed.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
The US didn't sign a treaty with Saddam saying we would not produce any weapons of mass destruction. So...yeah.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
They better not look in my garage... um wait a second... crap, now i have to move the missile. Anybody got some space I can rent? PM me ;)
 

rpc64

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2002
2,135
0
0
I just saw on the news that they found a storage unit in a neighboring city that was full of weapons. It was like a 20' by 10' unit and it was full of automatic rifles, machine guns, rocket launchers and flamethrowers and stuff.
 

nachiketa1

Banned
Jun 25, 2001
338
0
0
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: rpc64
I just saw on the news that they found a storage unit in a neighboring city that was full of weapons. It was like a 20' by 10' unit and it was full of automatic rifles, machine guns, rocket launchers and flamethrowers and stuff.

Looks like I won't be shopping there anymore.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Iraqi inspectors would look around the White Sands range, and some of our other larger military establishments, see the large piles of WMDs and Nuclear warheads... then they would hitail it back to Iraq and pray we never even thought about attacking them.
 

HappyPuppy

Lifer
Apr 5, 2001
16,997
2
71
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Iraqi inspectors would look around the White Sands range, and some of our other larger military establishments, see the large piles of WMDs and Nuclear warheads... then they would hitail it back to Iraq and pray we never even thought about attacking them.


Wrong. They would run to Kofi Anan and demand that the U.N. send its crack troops in to disarm us. We would, of course, comply out of fear that we would be occupied, our government dissolved and a socialist republic set up in its place.

Oh, wait, we already have the Democrats trying to do that to us.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Damn, it would take forever considering how big the States are. I could really care less if we do have WMD's, we have nukes. Even if we do have bio/chem we don't have a crazy leader with his finger over the big red button.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Originally posted by: nachiketa1
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.

You kind of said this as a joke.....but it is true. What are the U.N. inspectors doing there? They are searching every military base in the country. Do British inspectors search Area 51 for illegal nukes?

Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: edro13
Originally posted by: nachiketa1
It would be cool of Iraq came over and inspected Area 51 and other top secret installations in our country. I bet they'd find alien bodies, half animal half man creatures, tons of chemical and biological weapons, and a bunch of other top secret sh!t.

You kind of said this as a joke.....but it is true. What are the U.N. inspectors doing there? They are searching every military base in the country. Do British inspectors search Area 51 for illegal nukes?

Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Stability of the goverment/leaders that have them.

 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Because we are bigger, and can push around the supporting cast if we want to.

 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Originally posted by: Evadman
Also, why is it "illegal" for Iraq or North Korea to have nukes, but it's fine if we do?

Because we are bigger, and can push around the supporting cast if we want to.

Because we arn't threatening others with them.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: edro13
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.


You answered your own question.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
Originally posted by: edro13
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.


You answered your own question.

please elaborate.... I must be retarded
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: edro13
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.
Because, lately, we haven't used any WMD's on our own citizens or our neighbors, and the only time we did, we were in a world war with the other side.
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
They better not check my pants ;)
Rumor has it, all they'd find is a missle silo -- you know -- a big empty storage place. ;)
 

idNut

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2002
3,219
0
0
My teacher raised a very obvious but valid and good point: why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons?
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: edro13
Call me a bleedin' heart if you want to......but why do we have the right to defend ourselves with nukes, but they are subjected to being a victim to any army in the world that has nukes.
Because, lately, we haven't used any WMD's on our own citizens or our neighbors, and the only time we did, we were in a world war with the other side.
And how do we know this? Maybe we are testing them all the time. Because Iraq and North Korea are poor countries, they do not have the multi-billion dollar media-mongers peering down our throats.
 

nater

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,135
0
0
to me the idea of UN inspections just seem so dumb, kinda like the inspections of restaurants that are reported in the paper...most of the time the businesses know in advance that an inspection is coming and they clean up their act accordingly. It is only by chance that they find anything, that or the restaurant(country) is extremely stupid...but Iraq is not that dumb. Anyways, Iraq faces these pointless inspections, however, as a result of their invasion of Kuwait, IIRC.
 

Geekbabe

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 16, 1999
32,229
2,539
126
www.theshoppinqueen.com
all the UN inspectors would need to do is come to ATOT and check out all the lilttle pus pockets stored here,they'd sanction us in a heartbeat.