what has more bandwith

[OrganizedChaos]

human eyes or ears?

which organ could you pump more data through while still processing it in real time?

maximum 10% packet loss

discuss

 

[JohnAn2112]

This thread is a waste of my eye bandwidth. Thanks.

 

[dighn]

i'm guessing the eyes gets more data

 

[Ikonomi]

Originally posted by: ZePHyRaNTHeS
This thread is a waste of my eye bandwidth. Thanks.

This made me laugh. :thumbsup:

Anyway, I'd say the eyes have it.

 

[imported_Strang]

Originally posted by: Ikonomi;
Anyway, I'd say the eyes have it.

Ouch.

 

[EULA]

Originally posted by: ZePHyRaNTHeS
This thread is a waste of my eye bandwidth. Thanks.

Argh! At 10 calories/hour i cant believe I wasted my time reading this!

btw, what prices do you guys pay for your eye bandwidth?

 

[Chompman]

I don't know, eyes can take more in but images take up little size compared to sound.

Lets say during day the eyes win but during night the ears win

 

[EyeMWing]

Eyes. The frequency range that they cover is much larger.Both act in full realtime, thus the sampling rate is infinity.

 

[wfbberzerker]

the eyes throw out an enormous amount of information.

edit: err... rather your brain throws out a lot that your eyes perceive.

 

[pulse8]

Originally posted by: Chompman
images take up little size compared to sound.

You see things as stills!?

You need to upgrade your brain so you can get 150fps!

 

[Chompman]

Originally posted by: pulse8

Originally posted by: Chompman
images take up little size compared to sound.

You see things as stills!?

You need to upgrade your brain so you can get 150fps!

Bleh, I will wait a month so the price has dropped since the new 180 fps ones will be out

 

[neonerd]

Originally posted by: Chompman

Originally posted by: pulse8

Originally posted by: Chompman
images take up little size compared to sound.

You see things as stills!?

You need to upgrade your brain so you can get 150fps!

Bleh, I will wait a month so the price has dropped since the new 180 fps ones will be out

hahaha, don't forget to post in hot deals when it does,

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Chompman

Originally posted by: pulse8

Originally posted by: Chompman
images take up little size compared to sound.

You see things as stills!?

You need to upgrade your brain so you can get 150fps!

Bleh, I will wait a month so the price has dropped since the new 180 fps ones will be out

I've been thinking about upgrading to


...


DDR lately. Enough of



...


this fastpage stuff.

 

[geno]

Eyes

 

[kt]

The eyes may have more bandwidth, but you may experience frequent loss of connection if you masturbate too much.

 

[Peetoeng]

Eye.

Pick any movie dvd and compare the size of video to audio. Even 5.1 DD audio file is usually 1/10 the size of the video file.

 

[Chompman]

Originally posted by: Peetoeng

Eye.

Pick any movie dvd and compare the size of video to audio. Even 5.1 DD audio file is usually 1/10 the size of the video file.

That's because of how many frames they add.

Considering that the human range is maxxed out around 30 fps its just added fluff

 

[Cogman]

eyes by far. simplest way to prove it is with a game. Pull out something like starcraft, and turn off the sound, See how well you can play, then turn off the monitor. And this is just a small area of your vison.

 

[Ikonomi]

Originally posted by: Strang

Originally posted by: Ikonomi;
Anyway, I'd say the eyes have it.

Ouch.

Thank you, thank you.

 

[OverVolt]

Imagine trying to describe a 40picture slideshow to someone, eyes for images, ears for words/text etc.

You turn it around and try to 'show' someone what a particular noise sounds like.

Why am i in this thead?

 

[Jeff7]

Originally posted by: wfbberzerker
the eyes throw out an enormous amount of information.

edit: err... rather your brain throws out a lot that your eyes perceive.

Very lossy compression.
It probably depends on the person - I hear a short musical score, like just the intro to a show, and a minute later, I can't remember most of it. If I read a sentence, I can probably read it back verbatim. That helped me a lot in school, on standardized vocabulary tests.
Any classes where the teacher would do a lot of talking, with very few handouts, I either took notes, or I remembered nothing.
So my ears have compression akin to compressing a 5.1 Dolby stream down to an 8kbit 8KHz mono Mp3 file. Eyes are using high quality MPEG2 compression.

 

[zerocool1]

I'd say eyes

 

[MaxDSP]

Could this be the geekiest thread ever in OT?

 

[Cerb]

Neither. They are both analog.

 

[Cerb]

Originally posted by: Peetoeng

Eye.

Pick any movie dvd and compare the size of video to audio. Even 5.1 DD audio file is usually 1/10 the size of the video file.

That's because of frames and that there is an added dimension. Sound can be similarly represented (x,y,t), but generally isn't. Also, video can be recorded the same way--it's just not practical, given our technology (though tapes come close).