• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What happened to the PC gaming industry?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I've said it before, I think the focus has changed in production. At one time it was all about the game mechanics, graphics weren't good enough to focus, now what percent of development budget goes towards appearance? Is that something people think is a good thing?

We all have opinions, they're all valid from the right perspective. For me, I played ME2 for maybe 10 mins and decided not for me. I lasted longer in DA:O, not even close to finishing. But if the majority want flash (I don't mean to sound derogatory), it's cool.
 
Personally, I can see the OP's point. To me at least, it did seem like the 90s had the best PC games. You guys are forgetting some of the classics from the 90s as well -- who here remembers when LucasArts actually produced good games like the X-Wing and Tie Fighter series?

It just seems like that in the 90s and early 2000s, there was always a game on my radar to purchase. Now? Not so much, but I will admit, the fall of 2011 seemed to be one of the better seasons in a long time from a game (not platform-specific) perspective. You have BF3 and SWTOR coming out for the PC, GoW: Origins and Uncharted 3 coming out for PS3, and I'm sure there are more I'm forgetting (when does Diablo 3 come out? Is that next spring?).

I do understand the motivation for publishers to publish primarily to the consoles and I don't blame them. I still prefer the PC though even though I have all of the current consoles.
 
What happened to the PC gaming market? We went from the 1990s and early 2000s where there were lots of good games hitting the market, to it seems that every-other game is overhyped or a flop.

The popularity of more recent generations of game consoles killed the PC market. Games designed for the consoles tend to be watered down and disposable. Since the console market is so popular, new games are designed for the console first and then ported over to the PC. The Unreal Tournament series was even killed by consolization (UT3).
 
Just because I post something you disagree with does not make me a troll.

As I have asked other people in this thread, do you have anything to contribute, or are you just going to sling insults around?

Do you care to list any games that you enjoyed in either time period being discussed?

Its not the fact that I disagree with you that makes me label you a troll. I label you a troll because your initial post is filled with intentionally misleading information - as noted by myself and others, you listed the some of the greatest games from the 90's and 2000's, then listed a few busts from 2010 and pretended it was a valid list of comparisons.

I wasn't insulting you, I was calling you out for blatant trolling, and answering your question. You noted, out loud on a forum, that many people weren't giving you reasonable responses, and I told you why. Sulaco was kind enough to provide us a massive list of popular and well received games that have come out in recent years, and gothamhunter has done a great job of summing up the twisted logic of your initial post. I won't bother to belabor the point by repeating it, but I should hope you understand why you get so many negative responses, and if you truly weren't just trolling this time, maybe you can make a more coherent argument in your next thread so we can have an intelligent discussion, rather than people just telling you that you logic is flawed and you complaining about personal attacks.
 
I am not being nostalgiac, but there is not much of a chance the 1990's will ever be eclipsed when it comes to PC titles. It was the birth-place of almost every major franchise today. Doom/Quake/SimCity/C&C/Space sims (TIE Fighter/WC)/Descent/Starcraft/Civ/Half-Life/MechWarrior/Age of Empires/GTA/Warcraft/Tomb Raider/so forth.

Almost every genre was created, and many of the most valuable IPs around today are from this era. 3D came into it's own and PC gaming was everywhere. That is not to say a lot of good games were releases in 2000's (there were) and still today, but it's definitely not the same.

1990's = Revolutionary
2000's = Evolutionary
2010s = ??? To early to tell
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't insulting you, I was calling you out for blatant trolling, and answering your question.

Do you have anything to contribute to the discussion besides insults?


I am not being nostalgiac, but there is not much of a chance the 1990's will ever be eclipsed when it comes to PC titles. 2000's (there were) and still today, but it's definitely not the same.

1990's = Revolutionary
2000's = Evolutionary
2010s = ??? To early to tell

I think that is a good comparison.

The 1990s was the birth of PC gaming, the 2000s was the growth, and the 2010s is still too early to tell.

Will the games continue to evolve, or will they stagnate? For evolution to happen, there has to be some kind of driving force. As long as companies are making money, what is the driving force?

Once companies slip into a comfort groove of "we are making enough money", what is the driving force?
 
Last edited:
Do you have anything to contribute to the discussion besides insults?

Any further response beyond whats already been said would just be a validation that your thread has merit, which it doesnt - trolls like you thrive on this, you make an outrageous claim, people respond because they cant keep quiet about something so ridiculous, and suddenly it seems like there was some legitimacy to your claim simply because you goaded people into responding. You were rather quick to point out on page 1 that s44 "lost all credibility" because he called DNF a "silly shooter" but you seem to think your own ideas are beyond critique simply because you had them, and that you deserve a valid response regardless of the ridiculousness or complete lack of logic in what you say. Its become obvious that you were not just naive, but that you never desired a real discussion, and you are clearly trying to steer the direction of this thread toward a pre-defined goal.

You cannot goad me into responding to your misleading claims, but since you are so keen on keeping this on topic, how about you answer something for us?

Why didnt you provide a representative list of games for the 2010 decade? You can't claim ignorance of not knowing how many good games were released, because if you didnt even bother to take a look at a comprehensive list of some of the best games of 2010 and 2011, then why would you make a thread that has the premise that those years are full of bad games and few good ones?

Also, why didn't you make comparisons in 10 year increments, rather than choosing to compare two ten year periods to a 2 year period? Is it because your claims won't stand up if people simply look at the time periods of 1992-2002 versus 2002-2012? If not, please provide another reason.

Why do the vast majority of the games you list consist of FPS's? If those are the only types of games you enjoy or play regularly, then why are you trying to pass off your experience or knowledge as an indication of the trends of the entire PC gaming industry?
 
Any further response beyond whats already been said would just be a validation that your thread has merit, which it doesnt - trolls like you thrive on this,

All I ask for is some kind of discussion.

I posted my opinion, if you consider that trolling, then please stay out of this thread.


Why didnt you provide a representative list of games for the 2010 decade?

I provided the first games that came to mind.


Why do the vast majority of the games you list consist of FPS's?

Because that is what I have been playing since diablo II got old. I tried Titan Quest, and got bored with it rather fast. Tried Sacred, got a bored with it as well.

I do not care for third person shooters, tried them, did not care of them, probably will never buy a third person shooter.

I do not know what you are looking for, or wanting? Is there something wrong with posting an opinion about something? Just because you disagree with my opinion makes me a troll?

If you disagree with my opinion, say so. But there is no reason to attack me or my opinion. If anything, your post shows a lack of respect for others. Just because you disagree with someones opinion does not give you the right to sling insults at them.
 
Last edited:
All I ask for is some kind of discussion.
I posted my opinion, if you consider that trolling, then please stay out of this thread.

No, what you did is posted an "opinion" and tried to back it up with flawed logic, and bogus examples that framed the information in a way that makes your opinion seem more legitimate. You chose to use an unnatural and skewed time frame that would put your view in a positive light while making it difficult for others to respond to. People who want a discussion don't already have their mind made up, as evidenced by your initial post and your responses in this thread:

What happened to the PC gaming market? We went from the 1990s and early 2000s where there were lots of good games hitting the market, to it seems that every-other game is overhyped or a flop.

Its like the console kiddies from the 1990s are grown up, making games and the games are crap.

Or, are PC developers making games more towards the console fan club?

In my opinion, there is been a downturn in the overall quality of PC games in the past 5 years.

Because I feel the majority of the games being made these days are "mediocre".

I am not pretending anything, there are good games being made, but I feel the number of bad games outnumber the good games.

I wonder how much of the console deployment side has hindered PC development?

Take a multiplayer game, any game, how many can cross-platform between pc and consoles in multiplayer? Do consoles have rentable servers like PCs do?

How many console multiplayer servers can have modifications, new maps, add-ons,,,,?

I'm not even going to both going and picking out quotes from your last few threads on this topic, which look very much the same as these. Clearly your mind already seems to be made up.

Someone who is looking for a real discussion proposes their opinion in a logical manner and opens their mind to other possibilities. You have clearly demonstrated a lack of willingness to even try to understand why people are disagreeing with you, instead you just stubbornly re-post your own opinion as if its fact.

I provided the first games that came to mind.

Which is exactly the problem. You are trying to provide some kind of empirical evidence to us in your initial post that games have obviously gotten worse, because there are these lists of good games in the past and bad games in the last two years. However, you completely ignore all of the great games from the last two years, and also choose to ignore all of the bad and overhyped games of the past. It is deceitful, flawed logic, and again it makes you look like you are trying to convince people of something, rather than just share your opinion or start a discussion.

Because that is what I have been playing since diablo II got old. I tried Titan Quest, and got bored with it rather fast. Tried Sacred, got a bored with it as well.

I do not care for third person shooters, tried them, did not care of them, probably will never buy a third person shooter.

Okay, so we have established that your experience with the gaming industry is mostly limited to first person shooters. Yet you present your opinion as if its relevant to the entire industry. If you want to claim that your favored genre is falling out of favor in the industry and not getting as much attention and innovation as you would like, then say that and maybe you have a more valid point. However, you decided to purposely misrepresent information with your 3 lists, and now you are trying to extrapolate on that to make a statement about a broad industry while admitting that you don't even know anything about most of it. Once again, this makes it seem like you have an agenda and are trying to make a point, rather than share your opinion or start a discussion.

I do not know what you are looking for, or wanting? Is there something wrong with posting an opinion about something? Just because you disagree with my opinion makes me a troll?

If you disagree with my opinion, say so. But there is no reason to attack me or my opinion. If anything, your post shows a lack of respect for others. Just because you disagree with someones opinion does not give you the right to sling insults at them.

What I want is for you to be honest, admit that you were making an argument, not sharing an opinion. You weren't trying to start a discussion, you were trying to convince people of something. I'm tired of people hiding behind "opinions" because they cant be wrong. You made a statement about the state of the PC industry, used intentionally deceitful "data" to try to make your point, then continued to defend your position despite the disagreement by a majority of the posters. Now its been pointed out in very clear language what was wrong with your initial assessment, and someone was even so kind as to provide a fairly large list of quality PC games that have come out in recent years to solidly put your argument to rest. I'm tired of seeing this topic discussed over and over and over in every gaming forum in the world, always under the guise of an opinion, and usually with the same result - guy who thinks pc gaming is dying is usually just unhappy about some very recent turn of events like his genre not getting enough love or some major release he was hyped up about turned out bad.
 
Last edited:
I could make a blanket statement like music is dying and, to a certain extent, it would be valid. I could cite corporate greed, digital clipping, lots of annoyances (aside from digital clipping, they're all things that existed before). Some people would agree, some would disagree.

Point being it would, of course, devolve to a discussion of aesthetics. Maybe rock died with Elvis, perhaps advancements in sound technology have ushered in a golden age; just depends on tastes, experiences, where you grew up, when you started listening to music. I have relatives that think everything but polka sucks.
 
Please come back when you can respect a differing opinion from your own.

If an opinion was backed up with logic, it would be fact, and not an opinion.

More evidence that you aren't even looking for a discussion, you just want to force your "opinion" on to others.
 
you just want to force your "opinion" on to others.

I am not trying to force my opinion on anyone.

If you disagree with my opinion on how the PC gaming market is going downhill, please post it.

There is no right or wrong answer here, its all a matter of opinion.
 
Please come back when you can respect a differing opinion from your own.

If an opinion was backed up with logic, it would be fact, and not an opinion.


Ok, first of all, what the hell Texas. He actually makes an effort to have a valid discussion with you and that's all you reply to?

Second of all (regarding the above bolded)
Wrong, it would be an opinion that would matter. Logic!=fact.

Example:

Logical:
I dislike this PC gaming era because the majority of games that developers produce are low quality, even though there are still excellent games that exist, even ones that I did not mention.
What we wish you were saying/discussing/aruging/whatever

Illogical:
OMG THIS GENERATION IS THE SUXXORS BECAUSE THESE SPECIFIC GAMES I LISTED SUCK AND MY FAVORITE GENRE HAS GROWN STANGNANT.
What you are actually saying/discussing/arguing/whatever
 
I am not trying to force my opinion on anyone.

If you disagree with my opinion on how the PC gaming market is going downhill, please post it.

There is no right or wrong answer here, its all a matter of opinion.

So sad... I'm moving on, already spent too much time on a lost cause. Enjoy your thread.
 
Texas, if FPS games are your preferred genre, I can think of three recent, VERY good *PC exclusive* shooters you should look at:

Red Orchestra 2 (semi-realistic, nitty-gritty WWII multiplayer combat)
Hard Reset (oldschool-style run 'n' gun singleplayer FPS with a few neat twists)
Serious Sam 3: BFE (comes out next month, another old-school style FPS with lots of different hordes of enemies, includes co-op and deathmatch modes)

There. Now you know about some great PC-exclusive shooters, two that just came out last month, and one that's releasing very soon. They're also reasonably priced (only $30-$40, rather than you're typical $60 rip-jobs).
 
Red Orchestra 2 (semi-realistic, nitty-gritty WWII multiplayer combat)
Hard Reset (oldschool-style run 'n' gun singleplayer FPS with a few neat twists)
Serious Sam 3: BFE (comes out next month, another old-school style FPS with lots of different hordes of enemies, includes co-op and deathmatch modes)

Thank you, I will take a look at Hard Reset.

As for Red Orchestra 2, I have Day of Defeat, played it a few times and did not have any interest in it. There is something about WW 2 shooters, they dont seem to do anything for me.

Serious Sam: BFE, I preordered it a couple of weeks ago.
 
Back than people don't complain much. Game bug? Big deal! Forum? What is that?

Nowadays the very first thing is youtube its trailer and see if it is eye catching, then followed by preview, then review, then its forums. If the game gets the thumbsup, then people may purchase the game just to stay in its forum just to proof how wrong people are by showing irrelevant bugs, balances and arts related problems.

That means, any game without a getchy trailer is bad. Any game that requires any IQ, not Image Quality, but Intelligence quotient, is bad as reviews won't take more than a week on a game. In fact, they think they are good at playing games 🙁. Suppose a game somehow passes the review exam, it definitely going to be criticised by a sea of over-grown babies.

At the end, if a game doesn't make baby cries, with good graphics and requires 0 IQ to play, then it is a good game.
 
Back
Top