I see a lot of people skipping the regular maintenance items on their car's owner manual to save money or they are ignorant to read the owner manual. Things like regular oil change, timing belt, waterpump, transmission fluid/filter change, coolant change, spark plugs, etc. When the part fails, they are in panic mode, call their vehicle unreliable and probably have to pay more to get the car fix due to towing and extra damage that failed part may cause.
When I look at a car, I see thousands of parts that is manufactured by different companies all working together to make this "car" work. When one part failed short of its warranty period or service interval, I don't see the "car" being unreliable, but rather, just that part is unreliable and I usually look for a replacement part made by a different company.
With any cars, when they get miles on them, parts are going to wear out. I mean, do you really expect tires to last over 100k? Same with any parts, they simply wear out! To delay the inevitable, up-keeping of the vehicle is needed, things like oil change, transmission fluid change, coolant change, timing belt/waterpump, and etc. To ignore these maintenance items and when parts start to wear out/fair, I don't see the car being unreliable. I see operator error.
My GF recently bought a car with 100k. I'm doing timing belt/waterpump, cam/crank seals, engine mounts, air filters, valve cover gasket (oil leaks to plugs), intake manifold gaskets(have to remove to get to valve cover gasket), PCV valve, brake fluid flush, coolant, oil/filter, transmission fluid/filter, thermostat/gasket, tires, plugs/wires, and etc. I know I am going beyond what it needs, but I have no maintenance history on the vehicle and most parts looked like they been though 100k. I know those parts will not last another 100k, so I'm changing them now rather than waiting for the parts to completely wear out.
I feel a little offended when people says, "Wow, that car needed a lot of work! My car never need that much work!" They are probably right, but I wanted to be sure this vehicle will be trouble free for my girlfriend, instead of replacing stuff ever other week and I can be sure she won't be on the side of the road because of a broken timing belt.
When I look at a car, I see thousands of parts that is manufactured by different companies all working together to make this "car" work. When one part failed short of its warranty period or service interval, I don't see the "car" being unreliable, but rather, just that part is unreliable and I usually look for a replacement part made by a different company.
With any cars, when they get miles on them, parts are going to wear out. I mean, do you really expect tires to last over 100k? Same with any parts, they simply wear out! To delay the inevitable, up-keeping of the vehicle is needed, things like oil change, transmission fluid change, coolant change, timing belt/waterpump, and etc. To ignore these maintenance items and when parts start to wear out/fair, I don't see the car being unreliable. I see operator error.
My GF recently bought a car with 100k. I'm doing timing belt/waterpump, cam/crank seals, engine mounts, air filters, valve cover gasket (oil leaks to plugs), intake manifold gaskets(have to remove to get to valve cover gasket), PCV valve, brake fluid flush, coolant, oil/filter, transmission fluid/filter, thermostat/gasket, tires, plugs/wires, and etc. I know I am going beyond what it needs, but I have no maintenance history on the vehicle and most parts looked like they been though 100k. I know those parts will not last another 100k, so I'm changing them now rather than waiting for the parts to completely wear out.
I feel a little offended when people says, "Wow, that car needed a lot of work! My car never need that much work!" They are probably right, but I wanted to be sure this vehicle will be trouble free for my girlfriend, instead of replacing stuff ever other week and I can be sure she won't be on the side of the road because of a broken timing belt.