• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What does "PRO" mean for a SSD ?

Elixer

Lifer
Normally, the average person would think PRO means professional, or, a higher quality than a non-PRO version of the same device.

Looking at the Sammy 850 "PRO", it doesn't have any professional features, so, how come more reviewers aren't pointing out that these lack basic "PRO" features like power loss prevention ?

In Samsung's own FAQ, they say this about power loss protection:
Generally, when the power is turned off, the host sends a STANDBY command to the storage and guarantees a certain amount of time for the storage to maintain data consistency.
However, when the power is turned off due to exceptional causes, such as the power cable suddenly being unplugged by the user or removal of battery, the SSD may encounter an unexpected power failure.
In such case, the SSD must maintain consistency of the stored data.
In case of an unexpected power failure, the user data recorded in the volatile memory - DRAM - within the SSD may be lost.
To prevent data loss, the PLP (Power Loss Protection) feature is implemented to safely store the user data onto NAND flash in case of unexpected power failures.
The Tantalum capacitor within the SSD stores a certain amount of electricity while the power is being supplied.
This electricity is used to safely store user data on the volatile memory within the SSD onto the NAND flash when the power is cut off to prevent the loss of user data.

So, that has me thinking, if reviewers KNOW it don't have professional level features, and is misleading to the consumer, so, why don't they call them out on it ?
Simply stating these are not "enterprise" drives isn't enough IMO.
Enterprise does need power loss protection, but, they also need much higher endurance.

What happens when you do yank the power cable (aka simulated power loss event) from this "PRO" device, will it brick them, or, just corrupt all data or what ?
 
Last edited:
It means marketing guys figured it would make it seem better. They are marketed for heavy storage users, unlike others, but...

TMK, the 840 and 850 all have similar protection against scrambling or partial writes as the M500 and up from Micron, which should prevent bricking.

IMO, the whole storage device segmentation set up from all vendors has left a lot to be desired, since SCSI and PATA went away, allowing for servers and workstations with SATA drives. Not that the compatibility is bad, but there aren't clear feature and testing differences made clear amongst different SSDs, despite all the colorful marketing.
 
Last edited:
There is no such thing as an 850 EVO PRO.

EVO = TLC

PRO = MLC

So the PRO has a better TBW and MTBF rating...though the EVO doesn't even have a TBW rating provided by Samsung really.
 
There is no such thing as an 850 EVO PRO.

EVO = TLC

PRO = MLC

So the PRO has a better TBW and MTBF rating...though the EVO doesn't even have a TBW rating provided by Samsung really.

Yeah, will edit, but the main point is still there.
 
Yeah, will edit, but the main point is still there.

What point is that? There is market differentiation, you just don't agree that it's the right differentiation. If you're making decisions on enterprise-level storage devices and can't figure out that the 850 PRO is not an enterprise class device then perhaps a new job is in order.
 
Like Cerb said - basically a marketing gimmick aimed at describing a higher quality that can justify a higher price. The 840 EVO and 840 Pro are a good example. By the same token, what does EVO stand for? 🙂
 
Even the EVO will still last longer than the useful life of the SSD (8-10years). The PRO series have been demonstrated to last longer in brute force reliability tests though. So if you want one that will really stand the test of time, go PRO.
 
PRO = MO

As in mo money

A Rose by any other name is still a Rose. Oswald was called a communist, but he only said he was a Marxist-Leninist. No -- I'm not going to pursue that analog too much further. It will just complicate the discussion.

Put it another way. It's marketing and sales. Which is an art-form devoted to hype. Hype falls into the category of general propaganda. But since it's "marketing," and "sales" we don't think of it that way so easily.

So they called the SSD the "Pro" version. If they call the Maximus VI Extreme a "Maximus" which is "Extreme," what does that mean? It likely means that you'll pay more to get more. But the SSD doesn't have to pass the bar exam.
 
Even the EVO will still last longer than the useful life of the SSD (8-10years). The PRO series have been demonstrated to last longer in brute force reliability tests though. So if you want one that will really stand the test of time, go PRO.

Unfortunately the manufacturer warranty on the amount of data written for consumer drives (including "Pro" ones) is generally for far less than what the NAND will physically allow (even if one just stopped at the rated P/E limit). For all intents and purposes, outside consumer/home usage scenarios, an SSD that exceeded the allowed TBW limit is as good as a dead one.
 
Normally, the average person would think PRO means professional, or, a higher quality than a non-PRO version of the same device.

Looking at the Sammy 850 "PRO", it doesn't have any professional features, so, how come more reviewers aren't pointing out that these lack basic "PRO" features like power loss prevention?
Using your definition for a PRO product, how many professional features does the MacBook Pro feature, and how does it stack against it's non Pro version? Is it equipped with a suitable PRO SSD for example?

PRO labels don't mean much nowadays, they just indicate products which vaguely claim to be among the best in their class. In the case of Samsung Pro SSDs, they pretty much deliver on that front, at least when performance is concerned.
 
But if you care about longevity, and stability (from power glitches, especially), shouldn't we all be buying enterprise SSDs?
 
But if you care about longevity, and stability (from power glitches, especially), shouldn't we all be buying enterprise SSDs?
Not really. Now, most Samsung, Sandisk, and Micron drives have resting data protection, and handle rolling back quite well. The enterprise ones mainly get you many more write cycles, by way of using tweaked top-bin flash, and more guaranteed OP. Any good MLC drive that's been out for awhile is probably as good as any other, as long as it's not from a company that might use marginal flash (old OCZ, Kingston, others?).

If worried about radiation and such, an Intel 730 would be a decent value proposition, I think.
 
How long do you really need an SSD to last? You guys really think you'll be using the same SSD's 10 years from now?
 
Back
Top