- Sep 26, 2011
- 9,497
- 5,713
- 136
If you're explaining, you're losing. I agree that the choice in slogan was quite poor. It should have been kept simple and focused on a tangible goal that gets broad buy-in. "Reform the police", "demilitarize the police", or "reinvest in X" would have been much better slogans. You'd still be fighting the right wing noise machine, but at least you wouldn't be starting out from a position where you've shot yourself in the foot.The major problem is the god damn terminology, not the actual idea behind the term.
Demilitarize the Police is probably as accurate and sounds substantially less like "abolish" to people who have close to zero critical thinking skills and are not interested in objective reality.
Somebody's probably going to call that "disarm the police". Though if that's not the official slogan it might not catch on.If you're explaining, you're losing. I agree that the choice in slogan was quite poor. It should have been kept simple and focused on a tangible goal that gets broad buy-in. "Reform the police", "demilitarize the police", or "reinvest in X" would have been much better slogans. You'd still be fighting the right wing noise machine, but at least you wouldn't be starting out from a position where you've shot yourself in the foot.
Jfc... Karens... Priceless... ReallyFor those curious
i really hope it works. in my 4 years in austin, i saw a dramatic increase in the number of homeless people.
i really hope it works. in my 4 years in austin, i saw a dramatic increase in the number of homeless people.
one of the best parts of this is that by providing long-term housing, people can actually get jobs because they'll have a mailing address. It's a huge enabler for getting people back on their feet and "back into society"
Somebody's probably going to call that "disarm the police". Though if that's not the official slogan it might not catch on.
I also like "Take the 'beat' out of the beat cops". As in not beating up people.

 
				
		