Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
i think this is applicable, since sound is analog and MP3s are digital thus DAC.
but i hated that class, so i'm not sure if i'm speaking in correct terms, although i passed with a B. i dropped out of computer engineering the second year, yuck. EE FTW.
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
i think this is applicable, since sound is analog and MP3s are digital thus DAC.
but i hated that class, so i'm not sure if i'm speaking in correct terms, although i passed with a B. i dropped out of computer engineering the second year, yuck. EE FTW.
Switching from CPEG to EE exempted you from learning more about DAC/ADC? I just did a whole EE class last semester on DSPs and the theory of quantization and all that stuff.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
i think this is applicable, since sound is analog and MP3s are digital thus DAC.
but i hated that class, so i'm not sure if i'm speaking in correct terms, although i passed with a B. i dropped out of computer engineering the second year, yuck. EE FTW.
Switching from CPEG to EE exempted you from learning more about DAC/ADC? I just did a whole EE class last semester on DSPs and the theory of quantization and all that stuff.
you can take tech-electives if you want to learn about DSP, but i'm specializing in power so i don't have to. i took some signals classes, but nothing about this kind of stuff. i dropped out of CpE because at the time i didn't like all the programming classes i had to take.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Remeber that digital is a "stairstep" approximation of a wave. A higher bit DAC allows more "stairsteps" which in turn allows a closer approximation of the analog wave.
ZV
Originally posted by: LS20
Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Remeber that digital is a "stairstep" approximation of a wave. A higher bit DAC allows more "stairsteps" which in turn allows a closer approximation of the analog wave.
ZV
i dont think it has more samples or more "stairsteps", but rather, each sample is more precise
[/think]![]()
Originally posted by: LS20
Originally posted by: JohnCU
think of an MP3 with a high bitrate, it sounds better than those with low bitrates since it has more samples.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Remeber that digital is a "stairstep" approximation of a wave. A higher bit DAC allows more "stairsteps" which in turn allows a closer approximation of the analog wave.
ZV
i dont think it has more samples or more "stairsteps", but rather, each sample is more precise
[/think]![]()
Originally posted by: Sphexi
If a higher bit DAC is better, then why is it that I keep seeing "high-end" multi-thousand dollar amps with 1-bit DAC, that are advertised towards audiophiles? Any bonus to having a single-bit like that?
Originally posted by: Sphexi
If a higher bit DAC is better, then why is it that I keep seeing "high-end" multi-thousand dollar amps with 1-bit DAC, that are advertised towards audiophiles? Any bonus to having a single-bit like that?
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Sphexi
If a higher bit DAC is better, then why is it that I keep seeing "high-end" multi-thousand dollar amps with 1-bit DAC, that are advertised towards audiophiles? Any bonus to having a single-bit like that?
They use Sigma-Delta DACs, which operate on a very differnet principle than the higher bit ones.
A 1-bit DAC is a term used in consumer electronics marketing to refer to oversampling digital-to-analog converters (DACs) that use an actual 1-bit DAC (that is, a simple "on/off" switch) in a delta-sigma loop operating at multiples of the sampling frequency. The combination is equivalent to a DAC with a larger number of bits (usually 16-20), therefore the 1-bit label is a bit of a misnomer.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: Sphexi
If a higher bit DAC is better, then why is it that I keep seeing "high-end" multi-thousand dollar amps with 1-bit DAC, that are advertised towards audiophiles? Any bonus to having a single-bit like that?
link? i would like to see the context/other technical details...
Originally posted by: JohnCU
are you sure? the analog signal that comes out of the DAC becomes more "precise" with more bits. a true analog signal has an infinite number of points, but alas a non-ideal DAC does not have infinite memory, so at best it is only an approximation, aka the stair-step approximation mentioned above. think of a cheap DC-AC inverter sinusoidal signal.
Originally posted by: LS20
Originally posted by: JohnCU
are you sure? the analog signal that comes out of the DAC becomes more "precise" with more bits. a true analog signal has an infinite number of points, but alas a non-ideal DAC does not have infinite memory, so at best it is only an approximation, aka the stair-step approximation mentioned above. think of a cheap DC-AC inverter sinusoidal signal.
"accurate" replication of a signal can be improved with either higher sampling or higher bit-rate .. which are discrete things. higher bit means each each sample is higher accuracy of each sample... goes along with Ms Dawn says... for example instead of each sample being in increments of 4v (either 4 or 8 or 12 or 16, etc)... they can be stored in 1s (1,2,3,4)... ie more "discrete levels"
my understanding of it, atleast. im not ee![]()