What do you think life will be like in 100 years?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Mai72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2012
11,562
1,741
126
Pretty much, but hopefully medicine and genetics will have made strides until then keeping our bodies healthy and good looking no matter how badly we eat.

I think is America has a very high rate if obesity (over 70%) that is could cause our downfall. The health care system would be over ran with the sick, and we wouldn't have enough young men to fill the military. We are starting to see someo this now. Maybe science and medicine can combat some of this? Who knows...
 

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
9,391
8,769
136
We will still be the only industrialized country without healthcare for everyone.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
IDK. I be pretty ded by then. Well, I hope so anyway. Otherwise, someone has stolen my brain to connect it to Deep Think.

Even with anti-aging drugs and advancing medical care, progressing in the next 20 years (roughly) to extend human life I agree, 100 years from now I'll most likely be pretty tired of being here anyway!
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
51,285
7,078
136
I think is America has a very high rate if obesity (over 70%) that is could cause our downfall. The health care system would be over ran with the sick, and we wouldn't have enough young men to fill the military. We are starting to see someo this now. Maybe science and medicine can combat some of this? Who knows...

From my experience, as humans, we struggle with 2 core problems:

1. Buying into fake news
2. The ability to continually execute tasks that require consistent effort over time

I spam my tutorial on Macros as often as possible because of the lack of clarity available:


Current stats from the CDC:

1) 9.2% of America is severely obese (FYI morbid obesity is now called Class III Obesity)
2) 41.9% of America is obese
3) 73.6% of America is overweight

My short story is that I was a string bean growing up, married a good cook & got a cubicle job, and blew up. I had NO IDEA how to get in shape, so I did the usual bro-science route of plain chicken & broccoli non-stop. It worked, but it wasn't sustainable. I went from a high of 260 pounds down to 180 pounds. Total of 80 pounds lost over time (max recommended weight loss speed is 2 pounds per week). Very easy way to still eat what you want, on your schedule, but just have the addition of weighting & counting to get you weight-loss & high-energy results! Which boils back to our 2 problems as human beings

1. We are willing to buy into fake news. Very few people I know IRL have been willing to try macros, despite struggling with their weight & having multiple failed dieting projects that historically haven't proven to be reliable. It's very hard to convince people that the food itself doesn't technically matter for results (obviously, it's not a license to eat junk food 24/7, but there are no cheat meals, cheat days, or "bad" foods on IIFYM!) & it takes a pretty open mind to be willing to entertain the idea of how macros work!

2. Being consistent at things that require effort, no matter how simple it may be, is incredibly difficult for most people. It's not just a matter of trying macros, but sticking with it that makes the difference! Or doing any other type of dieting type of lifestyle that suits your individual preferences!

The combination of being overweight AND being sedentary is like the worst possible combination to have, health-wise. Not exercising is worse for you than smoking, diabetes, and heart disease:


They just updated their recommendations and say that a mere 11 MINUTES A DAY of exercise is enough to offset the risk of an early death:


I see obesity & inaction as major problems in America, especially as I have been personally affected by both (growing up with chronic illness that complicated my ability to exercise pain-free & later becoming overweight, or technically, obese by the current definition). The information is available, but change is hard, adopting reality is hard (because we all love our illusions!), and consistent effort is hard. I know what I'm doing with macros and I STILL have a hard time with it sometimes, lol!
 

Remobz

Platinum Member
Jun 9, 2005
2,564
37
91
I've often thought about the people who lived in the early 1900s. The photos of people who were alive back then looks so distant. Old. Ancient.

When humans who are living in the year 2100 look back at us, do you think they are going to say the same? Like...

"Look at that HUGE phone!"
"That is a Tesla? It looks so old."
"They used gas powered vehicles to get around?"
"Look at how funny they dressed."
"Why is that girl dancing on TikTok? What is TikTok?"

Will America be around in 100 years? Russia, or China?
If America is still standing, what do you think the makeup of the population will be?


If Earth still exists then we need to ask ourselves what shape will it be in?

Many here might focus on the good things concerning technology and medical advances.

As for me, I ask how messed up will our environment be? How many extinct species, how much pollution. How much habitats destroyed and creatures gone forever.

The negatives might far outweigh the good. kids might ask what was a whale? Or dolphin? Or what was the amazon jungle?
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,468
18,488
136
While humankind is capable of a great many things, I do not believe we will be able to absolutely obliterate the entire planet within 100 years, it will still exist. Maybe less things on it alive, but the planet itself will at least still be around.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
While humankind is capable of a great many things, I do not believe we will be able to absolutely obliterate the entire planet within 100 years, it will still exist. Maybe less things on it alive, but the planet itself will at least still be around.


The same can also be said about an "extinction-level" asteroid strike! ;)

 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,736
10,166
136
100 years. Much different. Geopolitical changes, migrations due to regions having different climates. Some will be uninhabitable. Some regions will be better suited to agriculture than now. People will migrate toward the poles where global warming isn't as big a deal.

No, there STILL won't be flying cars, the "Singularity" will NOT have happened and "AI" will NOT rule the world.
 
Last edited:

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,265
9,618
136
It's really hard to say, because we live in legitimately unprecedented times.

For 50,000 years the live of your average guy or gal was pretty much the same. Maybe he hunted, maybe he farmed. But he lived with a bunch of family and extended family as part of a small village or tribe. Life was hard as fuck.

For the last ~100 years shits gotten really wild, and it's basically thanks to oil. As that Dyson (not the vaccumes) guy once said "a civilization's ability to grow and prosper is limited only be the energy available to it". Oil is basically 3 billion years of liquid sunlight and it's a pretty badass source of energy. Gonna be hard to beat.

So I really think it comes down to what our post oil energy looks like. If we got nothing, then we're not far from going back to living like humans have lived for the prior 50,000 years. If we have actual for realz energy alternatives, then we have a more prosperous future ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
Even more inequality
The reintroduction of child labor
Resource wars incl water shortages
Climate change damaging many coastal cities
The rich live to 120+ but the poor struggle to make 70.

All the fun stuff. We'd probably have better phones though. That's important.

He said 100 years. Not 100 days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken g6

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,173
6,399
136
There will be no life in 100 years because I'll be dead. The universe is a figment of my imagination, so when I die, it ceases to exist.
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,265
9,618
136
There will be no life in 100 years because I'll be dead. The universe is a figment of my imagination, so when I die, it ceases to exist.

-Fuckin solipsists man! say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, at least it acknowledges existence outside of yourself!

-Walter from another dimension