What do you think about this statement?

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Just heard someone say:

"Insurance is for people that don't have the discipline to set money aside. Not for a rainy day, but for an emergency. People waste money on insurance when they could be saving it and safely getting a return."

My initial reply is yeah, that sounds about right, but insurance also gives you immediate coverage instead of having to wait years for your "emergency fund" to build up to a safe level.

I don't know, wondering what others think about it. We always hear the side about how bad it is for people to not have insurance. This kind of puts a spin on it.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Are you going to have $100,000+ in cash when you hydroplane into a telephone pole and need to go to the hospital?

Short of being extremely wealthy, I don't know if anyone is in a position to set aside the cash for a real costly emergency.
 

yinan

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2007
1,801
2
71
You need both.

Insurance in general is rather cheap compared to what it can pay for.
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
That statement is an oversimplification, but there is a nugget of truth to it.

I see a lot of people who have $100 deductible on their car insurance, or $250 deductible on their homeowner's insurance. If they raised those deductibles to $500 or $1000, they could save hundreds every year. You set aside some money to cover your deductible and use the insurance for the big losses, and end up ahead in the vast majority of cases.

Use insurance for big losses, not every little thing. In that context, I agree with the statement quoted by the OP.
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
This kind of reminds me of a friend of mine. He's pretty much a hippie, living as close to "within his means" as he can. He doesn't spend a lot of money anywhere, saves most of his cash, and tries as hard as he can to be thrifty wherever possible. He got a small house for himself and it killed him to get his house insured. He feels like getting insurance means that you are living outside of your means. Living within would mean that you are able to take care of issues and disasters that may arise by yourself.

I can't say I agree completely with him, that's just a little extreme, but again its a perspective that is rarely seen and practice that is rarely used.
 

Cuda1447

Lifer
Jul 26, 2002
11,757
0
71
Insurance is for things you cannot afford to take care of when something happens. Health Insurance, Car insurance. You don't put insurance on a cell phone, because you can afford to pay $300 for a new phone if you happen to drop it. You insure your body though, because if you need neck surgery you can't come up with the $75,000 it will cost.
 

MattCo

Platinum Member
Jan 29, 2001
2,198
2
81
Emergency funds cover things that a warranty would. Insurance protects your wealth.
 

compman25

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2006
3,767
2
81
Originally posted by: BigJ
Are you going to have $1,000,000+ in cash when you hydroplane into a telephone pole, kill a kid standing near by, and need to go to the hospital?

Short of being extremely wealthy, I don't know if anyone is in a position to set aside the cash for a real costly emergency.

fixed
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
wondering what others think about it.

I'm thinking that person is either very wealthy or just has no clue about how much true emergencies actually cost.

It would take me about 10 years (at the same rate that I pay for insurance) to have built up the funds for my wife's recent hospital stay (migraine) which was billed out at a comparatively cheap/meager $15,000. God forbid something more traumatic happens, like a car accident.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Working in the insurance industry I have to say that is an ignorant statement.

Insurance is there to put you financially where you were prior to your loss. Even if you have the cash/ability to pay out of pocket for that $500,000 home that was destroyed by fire, or the $50,000+ it costs from an auto accident, or the $80,000+ that isn't uncommon for medical expenses should you spend that?

For a simple example, say you spend $500/half for insurance. Five years later you have put $2500 into the policy, and you get into an auto accident. Nothing too major, but the accident in total cost $10,000. So you have $7,500 you "saved". Now assume the insurance company doubles your rate. You are paying $1000/half now. Just to "break even" with how much that accident cost you need to pay 3.75 more years into that policy.

That is a simple example obviously, but not entirely unreasonable numbers. Take that and think about a house, which costs $250,000 and you spend $1,500/yr on insurance. To pay enough into that policy to cover your loss (without any kind of interest/growth) it would take 166.67 years.

Just as a side note statistic it takes about 3 years for us to start making money on a policy without any losses happening.
 

Pacemaker

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2001
1,184
2
0
I just find it strange that insurance is essentially you betting that something bad will happen to you and the insurance company betting that it won't.
 

Cuda1447

Lifer
Jul 26, 2002
11,757
0
71
Disgruntled, a question. How does it take an insurance company 3 years to start making money? Maybe I'm a bit ignorant but what type of upfront costs do you have that make it cost 3 years worth of premiums to make a dime?
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Disgruntled, a question. How does it take an insurance company 3 years to start making money? Maybe I'm a bit ignorant but what type of upfront costs do you have that make it cost 3 years worth of premiums to make a dime?

I'm guessing it's not upfront costs (like paperwork or processing), but it's catching up with claims from other people. The statement comes from the larger perspective.
 

Uppsala9496

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 2001
5,272
19
81
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Disgruntled, a question. How does it take an insurance company 3 years to start making money? Maybe I'm a bit ignorant but what type of upfront costs do you have that make it cost 3 years worth of premiums to make a dime?

It's a general statement.
You don't technically see a profit until that policy has expired because on the very last day of the policy a claim could come in.
Then there are certain lines of coverage (like the one I underwrite) where we can't calculate our loss ratio until 6 years after the policy has expired due to the potential claim reporting window.

Most lines of insurance run around a 75% loss ratio. When only making a 25% profit on premiums it takes that 3 years to build up enough of a reserve to start making a profit.
Of course some policies are profitable from day 1 whereas some are losers where the company will never make a penny off them.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Disgruntled, a question. How does it take an insurance company 3 years to start making money? Maybe I'm a bit ignorant but what type of upfront costs do you have that make it cost 3 years worth of premiums to make a dime?

I'm guessing it's not upfront costs (like paperwork or processing), but it's catching up with claims from other people. The statement comes from the larger perspective.

That is looking at the policies as a whole. All a customer sees is the agency up front. Behind the scenes there is a lot more going on. I'll give you a simple walk through of the various costs.

Edit: Uppsala9496 gave the basic reason why, and basically nailed it. If you want some other aspects keep reading.

Before the policy is even started:

First is the actual agent and their staff. Some insurance companies agents are paid by the company, others are their own business they run. Either way the company has to pay the agency for their managment of the policy. An agents book of business is all the policies they "own" or manage. We pay them on a commision basis for their work.

Secondly the policy gets sent to underwriting for review. My company it takes two paths (as with most), either it is automatically accepted by the system (as it meets requirements) or it isn't accepted by the system and it gets reviewed by an underwriter. If it is automatically accepted, the money spent in the equipment and R&D on the algorithms used is part of the cost. If we review the policy there is even more cost, because an employee gets paid for that in addition to all the equipment they need.

Once it gets accepted:

We have to manage that policy. If an insured wants to change their deductibles, add/remove a vehicle/driver, change coverages, etc every time that happens that costs us money. Policies reguluarly get 2-3 updates/changes every 6 months. Once again the agent gets paid for the policy, if the insured called into the 800 number that employee gets paid, if the change has to get reviewed that costs money, etc.

The amount of captial it costs to manage a policy costs money, factor in to that fact we must remain solvant and like banks hold a portion of the insured asset money in cash. We do invest money, and that is a big part where insurance companies are able to soak up multi-million/billion dollar losses from natural disasters.

It's just like any other service offered, that you only see the front end (or in this case don't even get any tangible benefit like most services). That statistic is also taken from all the policies we insure on average it takes 2-3 years to start to make money on it. I'm not saying that every policy is like that, because it's not. Some policies make money sooner, but that is rare.

If we insure 1000 policies that are average $500/half, and have 10% have losses (a low figure) in the first year and average $5,000 then that means we took in $1,000,000 and paid out $500,000. Factor in the agency costs, employee and capital costs, the costs of claims (remember just because a claim is $5,000 we spend much more then that in the handleing of the claim), accounting, advertising (which insurance companies do a lot of), etc. That $250,000 paid out, cost us more in the realm of $650,000+ from just the claim itself before any other expenses like capital are considered. I am using lowish figures to keep it simple, it shouldn't be too hard to see how one year of those policies cost us over the million we took in from premiums. Once again 10% loss rate is really low (for most lines of insurance), and it's generally a lot higher then that (depends on the the type of insurance and other factors though).

I don't remember the exact study that was done (it was about a year and 1/2 ago I saw it), but if you were more interested I could most likely dig up some information about it.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
While there are some really good and informed reasons why insurance is good posted here, I'll give you what I see as the final say on this. Insurance companies make money because for the majority of people insurance is a losing bet.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: SMOGZINN
While there are some really good and informed reasons why insurance is good posted here, I'll give you what I see as the final say on this. Insurance companies make money because for the majority of people insurance is a losing bet.

True, I've never needed my renter's insurance at $150/year, but having coverage against theft, fire, etc. has been worth it. It also has coverage against the UPS guy tripping at my front door and trying to get thousands in medical costs from me.

There's no reason why you can't have both savings and insurance. Like kranky said: "Use insurance for big losses, not every little thing."
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
I've definetly seen single hospital stays that have cost more than $1 million. Don't imagine he will be saving that up anytime soon.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106

Originally posted by: BigJ
Are you going to have $100,000+ in cash when you hydroplane into a telephone pole and need to go to the hospital?

Standard maximum coverage for most insurance policies is $25k or $50k, so your silly example would hurt someone with insurance just as much if not more than someone who saved up money.

Of course, insurance is required by law in most places, so for that reason alone it makes sense.

Originally posted by: Turin39789
I've definetly seen single hospital stays that have cost more than $1 million. Don't imagine he will be saving that up anytime soon.

I seriously doubt you or anyone in this thread has insurance coverage that high. Check your policy, it probably maxes out at $50k.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: SMOGZINN
While there are some really good and informed reasons why insurance is good posted here, I'll give you what I see as the final say on this. Insurance companies make money because for the majority of people insurance is a losing bet.

I will argue that point.

Odds are 1 in 4 (per google searching) that you will be in an accident in your lifetime.

The NHTSA 2007 safty data shows that 41,059 people were killed, and another 2,491,000 were injured. That means that for 2007 1% of the population were injured or killed. That is not including non-injury accidents (hitting animals, buildings, stationary objects, natural causes like hail/flooding, vandalism, etc). So every year you are in a vehicle you have a 1 in 100 chance of injury or death. Factor in the number of losses that don't result in either and it's easy 15% or higher for autos.

Insurance companies make money because they invest it, not from premium coming in. The fact is with auto, home, and health insurance you WILL make a claim against one of them in your life time (and odds are 2 of them). Find me one person who can go through life (and isn't rich/wealthy in the very top percent of earnings for working americans) without making a claim against insurance if they have it. You won't be able to, be it from the 25% chance of an auto accident in your life, claim on your home, or claim on medical coverage.

What about life insurance? Everybody that has a life insurance policy gets something out of it (well their loved ones do).

EDIT: forgot link to NHTSA numbers http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811017.PDF
 

rgwalt

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2000
7,393
0
0
You could never hope to save enough money to protect yourself 100% of the time. One major car accident could wipe you out. A kid tripping on your porch on Halloween could wipe you out.... Think of the car accident where you severly maim or kill someone (purely accident). Now imagine if that person were a doctor or lawyer with a wife and 3 kids... The family would come after you for every single penny you had to give. Insurance is there to help protect you against this kind of scenario. As you have more wealth to protect, you need more insurance. Now, the probability of this happening is very low, but think of being wiped out financially... Can you afford to let this happen by not carrying insurance?

Health insurance is another one... it gets more expensive and harder to obtain as you get older (when you actually need it most). I rarely use my health coverage because I don't need it, but I want it to be there if something serious happens. What if something happened and I needed a new kidney? I couldn't possibly come up with the money to make that happen. Even if I could save that kind of money, it would totally wipe me out financially. What if it were cancer and required costly, on-going treatment? Eventually I would be bled dry of cash. At that point I would need to start robbing banks to stay alive... Not a good scenario.

Insurance is a wise investment considering the potential "return" on the money invested in the premium.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: rgwalt
You could never hope to save enough money to protect yourself 100% of the time. One major car accident could wipe you out. A kid tripping on your porch on Halloween could wipe you out.... Think of the car accident where you severly maim or kill someone (purely accident). Now imagine if that person were a doctor or lawyer with a wife and 3 kids... The family would come after you for every single penny you had to give. Insurance is there to help protect you against this kind of scenario. As you have more wealth to protect, you need more insurance. Now, the probability of this happening is very low, but think of being wiped out financially... Can you afford to let this happen by not carrying insurance?

Health insurance is another one... it gets more expensive and harder to obtain as you get older (when you actually need it most). I rarely use my health coverage because I don't need it, but I want it to be there if something serious happens. What if something happened and I needed a new kidney? I couldn't possibly come up with the money to make that happen. Even if I could save that kind of money, it would totally wipe me out financially. What if it were cancer and required costly, on-going treatment? Eventually I would be bled dry of cash. At that point I would need to start robbing banks to stay alive... Not a good scenario.

Insurance is a wise investment considering the potential "return" on the money invested in the premium.

Ever see the movie John Q?
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Originally posted by: rgwalt
You could never hope to save enough money to protect yourself 100% of the time. One major car accident could wipe you out. A kid tripping on your porch on Halloween could wipe you out.... Think of the car accident where you severly maim or kill someone (purely accident). Now imagine if that person were a doctor or lawyer with a wife and 3 kids... The family would come after you for every single penny you had to give. Insurance is there to help protect you against this kind of scenario. As you have more wealth to protect, you need more insurance. Now, the probability of this happening is very low, but think of being wiped out financially... Can you afford to let this happen by not carrying insurance?

Health insurance is another one... it gets more expensive and harder to obtain as you get older (when you actually need it most). I rarely use my health coverage because I don't need it, but I want it to be there if something serious happens. What if something happened and I needed a new kidney? I couldn't possibly come up with the money to make that happen. Even if I could save that kind of money, it would totally wipe me out financially. What if it were cancer and required costly, on-going treatment? Eventually I would be bled dry of cash. At that point I would need to start robbing banks to stay alive... Not a good scenario.

Insurance is a wise investment considering the potential "return" on the money invested in the premium.


Most of your silly examples would not be covered by insurance either, so I don't really get your point.