• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What do woman want?

well, as an ambling, strapping, male i find this alarming. so now womens turn-ons, in order, can be summed up as:

1. money
2. chocolate
3. gay seks
4. freaky bonobos
5. straight men
 
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
 
That was pretty interesting.

It is nice to know that women get arouses by everything; I think there is a major conspiracy out there where women claim otherwise. Their mouth may say no, but their vag says yes.
 
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
Click to expand...

Yup, in addition, the female arousal mechanism might actually be an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration.
 
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
Click to expand...

Yup, in addition, the female arousal mechanism might actually be an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration.
Click to expand...

You're right... it's probably not so much that they "won't admit" it as they simply aren't aware. Since this was a study involving people who were already volunteering to have stuff stuck in and on their privates while watching Bonobo porno, I doubt they would have lied out of embarrassment.
 
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
Click to expand...

Yup, in addition, the female arousal mechanism might actually be an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration.
Click to expand...

BINGO!

Which is why women become physically aroused during forcible rape. They aren't turned on, but the sex makes their genitals respond as if aroused.

What women want is exactly the opposite of what they ask for.

Which is why the very same women who cry about wanting "just one man to prove they're not all alike" will pass up 50 nice guys for the first arrogant asshole they find.
 
No plethysmograph yet made can contain, let alone measure, my manhood.
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
8 pages 15000 words and still not a single applicable answer that we didn't already know.
Click to expand...

If you check out some of our laws, you'd see that almost all of them are worse than this 🙂
 
Women have probably always been this sexual...it's just that we've been living in several hundred years of puritanical denial 🙂
 
Basically just read the 1st page and the 7th page, maybe the eight page.

Other then that most of the article isn't worth the read
 
I dont think having "an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration" is at all the same thing as "being sexual".

My impression of the article (pg 6-7 mostly) was that women want to be desired.
 
Originally posted by: Cookie
I dont think having "an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration" is at all the same thing as "being sexual".

My impression of the article (pg 6-7 mostly) was that women want to be desired.
Click to expand...

and dominated in a safe way so they can be submissive.
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Cookie
I dont think having "an evolutionary (automatic) protective mechanism against injury upon penetration" is at all the same thing as "being sexual".

My impression of the article (pg 6-7 mostly) was that women want to be desired.
Click to expand...

and dominated in a safe way so they can be submissive.
Click to expand...

Yes.
'willing' submission
 
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
Click to expand...

In my learned experience the proper summary should be that the plethysmograph is not as useful a tool for reading women?s arousal as men?s, and that women are not as in tune with what really arouses them as men, perhaps because men have a literal measuring stick to gauge by.
 
Originally posted by: SMOGZINN
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Good summary seems to be that women are aroused by absolutely everything, just to varying degrees, and they won't admit to being aroused by certain things. They also are more attracted to women than men, even straight women.

Men, on the other hand, really are only aroused by seeing women, and when they say they're not attracted to other men, they mean it.
Click to expand...

In my learned experience the proper summary should be that the plethysmograph is not as useful a tool for reading women?s arousal as men?s, and that women are not as in tune with what really arouses them as men, perhaps because men have a literal measuring stick to gauge by.
Click to expand...

You're right; as I specified in my later post, I doubt that these women were really lying about what turns them on. But I think the point is that for women, physical arousal and mental arousal are two completely separate things. For men, not so much.

I do wonder, though, if that comes from some evolutionary trait or if it's a result of hundreds (nay, thousands) of years of sexual oppression?
 
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Women have probably always been this sexual...it's just that we've been living in several hundred years of puritanical denial 🙂
Click to expand...

previous gf, hell yes.
current gf, only sometimes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top