Not arguing against the rest of your post, but I never understood why some people see a connection between the "sun god" and "son of god" concepts. At least outside of son and sun being homophones in English (but not in any relevant ancient languages that I'm aware of)
lol, his name was abu - like the monkey in aladdin?
Really? In an area with a couple of dozen different languages and at a time when almost nothing is written down and all stories are passed along in a five-thousand year, thousand mile long game of telephone you don't see how "sun god, died and resurrected" morphs into "son of god, died and resurrected"? Really? It doesn't matter what ancient language it is or that they're not homophones in all languages. All that's important is the concept. Person A tells person B about a sun god, B repeats it to C and when C passes it to D he says "son of" instead of sun.
There were many gods in many religions in that area who predated Jesus and had almost the exact same life story. Born of a virgin with a name similar to Mary or Meri of Meary around the winter solstice, sun god or son of god, little known about him from age 1 to age 30, then became famous, died via being nailed to a tree or a cross, resurrected after 1 day or 2 days or 3 days, fed the hungry, etc etc. That basic story is a template for Horus, Zoroaster, Attis of Phyrgia, Dionysus, Romulus, Mithra and a bunch of others with varying degrees of similarity. There's not a single aspect of Jesus that isn't a direct rip-off from another god in the same region that came first.
I thought that was Saddam Hussein after they pulled him out of the hole he was hiding in.
Really?Khalid Sheikh Mohammed doesn't even remotely look like SH.
[/LEFT]
no i'd say more like Ron Jeremy.
Calling themselves the Hairy Brothers of Destruction, Mr. Jeremy and KSM confessed to a long list of crimes against humanity.
You're not even going back far enough.
El, Hadad (also sometimes referred to only as Baal), and Asherah, among many many others, are also all quite implicated in the trappings of later belief systems. While not necessarily invoking the concept of death/rebirth, that much is hardly the only commonality between modern religions and ancient religions. Heck, I find it fascinating more that at one time, Judaism quite strongly acknowledged that, while there are many deities, Yahweh was the most supreme of them all, and it really isn't detailed if he is in that position by way of nature, or if it was entirely because of the covenant established. Yahweh, the more ancient descriptions of him at least, heavily matched those of El (and Hadad at times, unless I am mistaken).
Many of the polytheistic religions match quite a bit to the ancient Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian, and Canaanite beliefs.
Really? In an area with a couple of dozen different languages and at a time when almost nothing is written down and all stories are passed along in a five-thousand year, thousand mile long game of telephone you don't see how "sun god, died and resurrected" morphs into "son of god, died and resurrected"? Really? It doesn't matter what ancient language it is or that they're not homophones in all languages. All that's important is the concept. Person A tells person B about a sun god, B repeats it to C and when C passes it to D he says "son of" instead of sun.
