I have moved on from msi raider to attack ep2c612 ws have 2 e5-2683 v3 this thing a beast stock 30 multiplier with 2.1 bios disable ht ranked 13 in 3dark with 3 1080ti stock only problem I have is my octal channel 2133 etc benchmarks to low in Sandra 80000 instead of 94000 plus memory read latency bit high in Aida 64 104 any one have some references with same board I can say without a doubt it supports 8 udimms as well as 2132p etc reg benchmarks same. Hope I don't have bad channels.anyway was hoping someone had the 2.13b original bios and also nodded bios thanks for your info gang!
No microcode. Arch Linux with linux-ck. GNOME DE.
I seem to got severe system slowdown after blender rendering for 5 hours and mprime small fft for 20 minutes (Both of the work cause the CPUs overheat a lot). The system runs fine before those extreme work.
Running blender/mprime again gives fine performance, but system has extremely slow response to everything (including chrome and mpv), and geekbench multicore is extremely slow unlike before the work.
I have switched to mc39 and I am observing.
Is there a BIOS available for ASRock X99 OC Formula? I only get error messages... "error in saving" in UBU 1.66.1, whatever that means. Can't seem to get many answers when googling the cause, and I do run it as admin and there's plenty of space on the drive.
In case a kind soul wants to help me out, here's a link to the most recent BIOS: ftp://europe.asrock.com/BIOS/2011/X99%20OC%20Formula(3.10)DOS.zip
Edit: just realized I'm using an old version of MMTool...
In case a kind soul wants to help me out, here's a link to the most recent BIOS: ftp://europe.asrock.com/BIOS/2011/X99%20OC%20Formula(3.10)DOS.zip
Edit: just realized I'm using an old version of MMTool...
Last edited:
"Error saving file" has nothing to do with disk space, but requires the APITO V work-around described in this post:
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/what-controls-turbo-core-in-xeons.2496647/page-28#post-38859671
There is a flag in your BIOS that must be cleared. Clearing that flag (changing 0x0C to 0x08) requires an offset elsewhere in the BIOS (of +4) to avoid completely breaking the checksum. I changed 3 bytes prior (change the 0x0C to 0x08 and then add 4 to the byte 3 positions to the left in a hex editor).
@cekim How did you achieve 3,6-3,8 Ghz on all 36 cores?
v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi? What have you changed in bios? I only get max 3.2 on all 18 cores with my taichi with that efi. Thinking about changing the board to the asus x99 WS 3.1.Same question here. Supermicro X10DAL-i.@cekim How did you achieve 3,6-3,8 Ghz on all 36 cores?
Using v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi gives out 31x/32x in non AVX load, 27x/28 in AVX load.
v3x2_50_vcc.efi gives out 32x/33x regardless of avx or not.
(CPU1 always slower by 1x)
Sorry for the confusion...@cekim How did you achieve 3,6-3,8 Ghz on all 36 cores?
I have 2x2696v3 on a single system in this case...
So, I am using 50% of each of 2 processors (9 cores each). The job/linux divides the 18 cores of work over those 2 cores (9 each).
IF I run a job that requires 36 cores, then I see 3.3-3.4GHz with the configuration described (and nonAVX loads).
If I'm seeing 3.6-3.8 on all or most at the same time it means that 50% or more likely aren't loaded with real work and are just spun up because the chip is in a higher power state. Again, if I load it down with real work on all 36 cores, it is 3.3-3.4 for non-AVX work. Which is still much better than the 2.7-2.8 you'd see without all of this...
Last edited:
As far as I know, it's like no one's your plate model. I have asrock x99, but the overclock formula
Ahh I see...Seems right, since I can run my e5 2696v3 at 3950Mhz on 10 cores.
Does somebody can give any tipp about loading the efi automatically? I load it manually every time from the usb (which is fs0) but I can't copy it (as the guide says on page 9) because I don't find the desired folder on fs1 or on the others. (I'm a noob)
in the discussion above, if a micro code is used, the avx frequency will drop.
but it is obvious that your system did not.
can you run prime95 test or linx, something that heavier load.
but it is obvious that your system did not.
can you run prime95 test or linx, something that heavier load.
1. NEW CPUs e5-4650v3 ES
Intel confidental
QH98 ES 2,10ghz
Malay
L444C137
2 . Second CPU Intel E5-2630v3 Normal CPU OEM 8c/16threads 2,40Ghz max turbo 3,20Ghz
on Asrock X99 Extreme4 bios 3,60
mod work :
jordanpchome
Junior Member
- May 28, 2017
- 6
- 0
- 36
Hello, everyone
I am from Taiwan users, would like to ask a few questions
I have three EFI files on the web, V3 V4 V5
The hash value of V3.EFI is the same as the file provided in this article
Compressed package which provides V5. EFI file, it is said that has been integrated 0x39 CPU microcode
But I can not find the source of the file
There are other users to respond to V5.EFI only four core can load 0x39 microcode, the other core will be loaded 0x36
Would anyone ask the latest EFI file? Thank you
↓↓EFI file download↓↓
https: //www.sendspace.com/file/21y5mp
In addition, I use the E5 2683 V3 + MSI X99A MPOWER
All the core seems to only 2.5Ghz, no longer higher
(Sorry, my English is very bad, the above are using google translation, if you have caused trouble to read please forgive me)
I am from Taiwan users, would like to ask a few questions
I have three EFI files on the web, V3 V4 V5
The hash value of V3.EFI is the same as the file provided in this article
Compressed package which provides V5. EFI file, it is said that has been integrated 0x39 CPU microcode
But I can not find the source of the file
There are other users to respond to V5.EFI only four core can load 0x39 microcode, the other core will be loaded 0x36
Would anyone ask the latest EFI file? Thank you
↓↓EFI file download↓↓
https: //www.sendspace.com/file/21y5mp
In addition, I use the E5 2683 V3 + MSI X99A MPOWER
All the core seems to only 2.5Ghz, no longer higher
(Sorry, my English is very bad, the above are using google translation, if you have caused trouble to read please forgive me)
Hi, I got instabilities with my dual 2696 v3 system. With vcc and mc39 efi, the temps are below 70C.
It's very likely to got kernel panic/oops during geekbench 4 test regradless of temp.
For blender rendering, if ambient temp ~22C then no reboots. If ~30C then reboot per one hour. I guess temperature matters a lot.
I would like to try -40 -30 -25 mc39 driver, and perhaps I should upgrade my CPU cooler.
Hi, I would like to try -40 -30mv efi. Is there a repo for the source so that I can compile and try it myself?
Can you explain how to remove v3.efi via shell and try the v3_1.efi or V3_2.efi?
When I go to shell and load the v3_1.efi I get message that it is already presented.
I also copied it to the fs1:\efi\boot to auto load it but want to remove it and auto load the v3_1.efi.
This is the link for modded latest stable bios for Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming5 if someone want to use it.
http://dox.bg/files/dw?a=334fd2c669
When I go to shell and load the v3_1.efi I get message that it is already presented.
I also copied it to the fs1:\efi\boot to auto load it but want to remove it and auto load the v3_1.efi.
This is the link for modded latest stable bios for Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming5 if someone want to use it.
http://dox.bg/files/dw?a=334fd2c669
@Jolognai : when in shell, try to copy from fs0 (USB, check on the list, it said USB) to fs1 (by trying with "TAB key" to auto-complete fs1:\EFI, and then fs1:\EFI\boot. if not try fs2:\EFI (still with "TAB key to auto complete". If you have several windows partition, copy to each and try. And then "bcfg driver add ...."
@Filko84 : bcfg driver rm 0
@Filko84 : bcfg driver rm 0
I can confirm that driver is loaded, modded bios for GA-X99 gaming 5 is working (I shared it few post above if someone want to try it), but now I find that this mod is working for QS and OEM CPUs with CPUID 306F2.
My CPU is E5-2630L ES with stepping 1, CPUID 306F1 and can go up to 2.0Ghz on all cores! Is there already a mode for this stepping or I am screwed?
Is there some other string that need to be edited in bios for this CPUID? I have already tried V3_1.efi and I can boot to Win 10 OS, but all core turbo is max x20 multi!
For single core the turbo is x25, so it will be great if I gen get 8 cores at 2.5Ghz.
My CPU is E5-2630L ES with stepping 1, CPUID 306F1 and can go up to 2.0Ghz on all cores! Is there already a mode for this stepping or I am screwed?
Is there some other string that need to be edited in bios for this CPUID? I have already tried V3_1.efi and I can boot to Win 10 OS, but all core turbo is max x20 multi!
For single core the turbo is x25, so it will be great if I gen get 8 cores at 2.5Ghz.
Last edited:
What sort of voltages do people use on these 18c chips when maxing them out? My 2686 runs at sub-0.8v when at 2.3GHz, which I suspect might not be enough when at 3GHz all cores fully loaded trying to man up to figure out the whole thing, but can't risk screwing up my system before my exams are done.
trying to man up to figure out the whole thing, but can't risk screwing up my system before my exams are done.Can be tough to debug remotely, but first question is whether your OS was installed using UEFI? If you don't find an FSn:\EFI partition or something like it (where "n" is 0, 1, 2, etc...), then that likely means your OS is not installed in UEFI mode.
You can look In the System Information Utility for "BIOS mode" to check
Circling back to the Taichi boards with the latest v3x2_xxxxx EFI.
So far, I'm not able to reach 3.3-3.4 on the taichi boards with a 2696 as I can with the Z10PE-D16-WS.
I can get another 100MHz (3.2) vs the prior 3.1 all-core turbo (V3.EFI vs v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi), but the same chip and .EFI on the Z10PE is producing 100-200MHz more for all-core speeds with the same chips.
So far I've tried:
v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi
v3x2_50_vcc.efi (with 0x29 and 0x39)
On the Taichi board, I'm consistently getting 3.2GHz all-core in stressapp.
So far, I'm not able to reach 3.3-3.4 on the taichi boards with a 2696 as I can with the Z10PE-D16-WS.
I can get another 100MHz (3.2) vs the prior 3.1 all-core turbo (V3.EFI vs v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi), but the same chip and .EFI on the Z10PE is producing 100-200MHz more for all-core speeds with the same chips.
So far I've tried:
v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi
v3x2_50_vcc.efi (with 0x29 and 0x39)
On the Taichi board, I'm consistently getting 3.2GHz all-core in stressapp.
I get the exact same results with the same board and cpu. (v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi)
That would have been my 1st question if it is normal or not.
In cpu-z I get 3.2Ghz but some other things like premiere pro rendering I get 3.1Ghz. ( no blck changed)
If I load 'v3x2_50_vcc.efi' (so no microcode loaded - C6 state off this way to avoid freezing) I get 100Mhz more - so 3.3 or 3.2 with no blck changed. I'm experimenting if I can raise the blck a bit and still maintain the system stable.
Somebody said earlier on this forum that it doesn't worth the 100Mhz using it without a microcode because you loose cpu cache speed (he said 2300mhz instead of 3000mhz with microcode).
I don't know if it's true or not. How can you monitor cache speed?
On the other hand I'm interested in if the asus z10pe d8 ws would work with one and also with two 2696s?
Maybe I'll change the taichi board to that so when I want to upgrade to 2 cpus the board will be ready.
What are the drawbacks using double-socket boards with only one cpu?
Would I achieve 3.3 or 3.4 ghz with one and with two cpus too?
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 10K
-
-
Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 13K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
Facebook
Twitter