• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What Can i do About this? Accused of posting Child porn on a website?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
As much as I hate to defend the guy, a fully clothed teenage girl on a table is not considered "child porn".

it did not say he posted child porn, they said he posted a picture from a child porn site. if you look at the pic, it clearly has a url to this child porn site.

therefore it is a valid banning and the OP is an idiot.

No, it's not. There is no "child pornography" on that site. It's pictures of that girl, and none of the pictures have any nudity or sexual content. Bad taste yes, pornography no.

You do know the definition of child pornography don't you?
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
That's not porn - IGN has more than that in the Formen category - but it's definitely not safe for work and probably violates their TOS.

Say you're sorry, you weren't aware that the "porn" rules extended to PG-13 pics, and stick to linking to the formen.ign.com stuff.

Oh, and quit fapping to kiddie model sites. Chester. 😛

- M4H

What is IGN and formen category? thought IGN was the game mag?( OK looked up IGN it is the gam mag! now why the heck is he even posting such stuff therE?) ok im confused heh


When i first started taking pictures of my daughter i wanted tips on how to take pictures of children. Lighting/focus/how to keep them still heh. while searching i found some very bad sites. way worse then those that the OP posted. While not Kiddie porn but i would say some is borderline.

just a tip. when searching on good sites to take pictures of kids. be REAL CAREFUL!
 
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
As much as I hate to defend the guy, a fully clothed teenage girl on a table is not considered "child porn".

it did not say he posted child porn, they said he posted a picture from a child porn site. if you look at the pic, it clearly has a url to this child porn site.

therefore it is a valid banning and the OP is an idiot.

No, it's not. There is no "child pornography" on that site. It's pictures of that girl, and none of the pictures have any nudity or sexual content. Bad taste yes, pornography no.

You do know the definition of child pornography don't you?
Registrant:
webeweb corp
PO BOX 480027
FT LAUDERDALE, Florida 33348-0027
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: LYDIA-MODEL.COM
Created on: 22-Jun-04
Expires on: 22-Jun-05
Last Updated on: 22-Jun-04

Administrative Contact:
corp, webeweb nocontactsfound@secureserver.net
PO BOX 480027
FT LAUDERDALE, Florida 33348-0027
United States
9545672922
Technical Contact:
corp, webeweb nocontactsfound@secureserver.net
PO BOX 480027
FT LAUDERDALE, Florida 33348-0027
United States
9545672922

Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.WEBEWEB.NET
NS2.WEBEWEB.NET

This domain is NOT Available

 
Ok, not sure what you were trying to make a point out of? What does that information have to do with child porn? 😕
 
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
As much as I hate to defend the guy, a fully clothed teenage girl on a table is not considered "child porn".

it did not say he posted child porn, they said he posted a picture from a child porn site. if you look at the pic, it clearly has a url to this child porn site.

therefore it is a valid banning and the OP is an idiot.

No, it's not. There is no "child pornography" on that site. It's pictures of that girl, and none of the pictures have any nudity or sexual content. Bad taste yes, pornography no.

You do know the definition of child pornography don't you?




exactly. And that girl is like 17 or so? i dont really see a problem with that. Its total BS. I am calling for A boycott of their gay site
 
Originally posted by: Princefield2040

exactly. And that girl is like 17 or so? i dont really see a problem with that. Its total BS. I am calling for A boycott of their gay site

I didn't say I agreed with you, or your choice of posting...I just don't think that picture is anywhere near rising (or lowering) to the level of "child porn". They consider that picture a violation of their TOS, so they are within their rights to ban you.
 
Back
Top