what brought down building 7 of the WTC?

[alchemize]

PS for our new tinfoilers - I ask each of you - if you truly believe this - are you cowards are are you men?

WChou? Beyoku? Cowards or men? Simple question. Are you going to allow evil to flourish or are you going to do something about it. Posting on the internets while you "pull it" doesn't count.

 

[beyoku]

1. Yes, IT could refer to the operation. But we can either read into what he said and find that indirect meaning OR we can take exactly what he said and know what it means.
(5:48 of the video) Luis Mendes of the Dept of Design and Construction talks about "pulling buildings," #6. We also know for a FACT the buildings 4, 5, and 6 were brought down with explosives. Why is it so hard to believe that 7 wasnt as well. In one argument you have the owner saying to pull the building, and you have multiple witnesses saying they heard the explosions, and you have the visual of a demolition that looks purely controlled. But i should just disregard all the other stuff and just read into what he MAY have meant, and take the official story. Have we not learned what we have been given in terms of the "Official Story" for the past 3 years.

2. Man, i had never said anything about some type of "inside job" regarding the twin towers. I only spoke of Building number 7 and how multiple people including the owner said it was brought down in a controilled demo. Also what are you suggesting? I am not extreme in any case, to flip the coin - are you posting on location in Afghanistan? Does that make you a coward? Sorry, this is not a black and white issue. YES it is conceivable that he meant "pull it" as "IT" being the team. BUT to me it makes more sence to just take what he said and know its meaning looking at the results as proof, that is not even taking into account the witnesses.

Do think that it is in any way plausible that he meant "Pull It" and "it" meant the buildings? Or is it just totally skewed NOT to read into someones meaning and take their words literally?
Dont you think that most people hearing what he said, and knowing what "pull" means, and then seeing what happened - would think that the buildings were demolished? To me this seems like the most logical reasoning.

EDIT: No personal attacks on my brain please....

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: beyoku
This is bulding 7. Why is everypone talking about the others. If you watched the video all the clips, including the owner himself said they had to "pull" the building. THey also have other references and video of other people saying that building 7 was "pulled" or a "controlled demolition."
What is there to argue about Building 7? It came directly from the horses mouth.

EDIT - is there anyone here that has actually BEEN to the site and knows where building 7 is?

Did it ever occur to you that he could have meant "pull the operation" out? As in pull the firefighters out? That's the context of the quote - he's talking about the firefighters in the building, and how much loss of life there had already been.

When your mommy yells into the basement, and you say "I'm almost done pulling it", does she think you are demolishing a building?

Here's the quote in context :

http://www.letsroll911.net/images/PullIt2.mp3


Not to mention his quote says "they decided" as in the FDNY to "pull it" - so the FDNY is in the massive conspiracy also - those Neocon bastards!

Can any of the conspiracy theorists explain why the building owner would ask the commander of the NY Fire Department to "pull it" if he meant 'bring down the building'? Since when is a fire department involved in the initiation of the demolition of a building?

What was this commander responsible for? His men, of course. And that what he was told to pull - his men - not the building. Insisting otherwise is patently ridiculous.

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: alchemize
PS for our new tinfoilers - I ask each of you - if you truly believe this - are you cowards are are you men?

WChou? Beyoku? Cowards or men? Simple question. Are you going to allow evil to flourish or are you going to do something about it. Posting on the internets while you "pull it" doesn't count.

In all fairness, although I don't endorse these conspiracy theories, I fail to see anything cowardly about people who do. What action could they take, even if they were firmly convinced the theories were true? All they could reasonably do is spread the information and try to get the word out. Violent insurrection against the President seems a little, er, impractical. I guess I don't get why you're persisting in baiting them.