dullard
Elite Member
- May 21, 2001
- 25,476
- 3,974
- 126
Ignoring the obvious flaws in the premise of this thread, we can do the calculation.
We have spent ~$94 billion/year there. There are ~130 million tax payers. Thus, $719/year for each and every taxpayer. True, some tax payers pay less and others pay more, but I'll just post using that $719 number. It is probably a fairly accurate description of the amount of my taxes going to Iraq each year.
I don't drive much (9857 miles/year average), and I have a fuel efficient car (2002 Civic, 29.9 MPG average). Thus, I use 330 gallons/year. True, many people use more than that, but I'm posting about myself.
Thus, if the Iraq war ended now, I'd save $719/year. I'd be just as well off if the gas price rose by an additional $2.18/gallon because then I'd spend $719/year more on gas. That would put gas at $2.18+$2.19 = $4.37/gallon today.
Of course, this doesn't include the intangibles, I'd be willing to pay a bit more than that to cover all the other benefits we'd gain by leaving Iraq.
We have spent ~$94 billion/year there. There are ~130 million tax payers. Thus, $719/year for each and every taxpayer. True, some tax payers pay less and others pay more, but I'll just post using that $719 number. It is probably a fairly accurate description of the amount of my taxes going to Iraq each year.
I don't drive much (9857 miles/year average), and I have a fuel efficient car (2002 Civic, 29.9 MPG average). Thus, I use 330 gallons/year. True, many people use more than that, but I'm posting about myself.
Thus, if the Iraq war ended now, I'd save $719/year. I'd be just as well off if the gas price rose by an additional $2.18/gallon because then I'd spend $719/year more on gas. That would put gas at $2.18+$2.19 = $4.37/gallon today.
Of course, this doesn't include the intangibles, I'd be willing to pay a bit more than that to cover all the other benefits we'd gain by leaving Iraq.
