Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
Whoa, wait a minute. When you're referring to "universal" values, are you talking about values that exist within the entire universe, or values that exist among humans?
Humans, sorry i fergot to mention that.
Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
Whoa, wait a minute. When you're referring to "universal" values, are you talking about values that exist within the entire universe, or values that exist among humans?
Originally posted by: capnyoaz1
REPOST
Originally posted by: aphexII
EXACTALLY!Originally posted by: dolph:-/... are you asking if there are any universal values that permeate all life, regardless of society?Originally posted by: aphexIIBut your speaking about within a set of rules, we were trying to step out of society and look at the picture from a whole...Originally posted by: FoBoTso barbecuing a baby alive and eating it is ok, sometimes? i am thinking there is no human society where it is ok to cook a human baby alive and eat it even in tribal societies the practiced canibalism, there were rules about who go eaten and under what circumstancesOriginally posted by: aphexII ...but our point was that there is always an exception. This then brought us into a debate on the definition of 'universal' and we came out with the understanding that it means 'unequivocally everyone'. In which case, i dont see any universal values that everyone holds true....
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: aphexII
EXACTALLY!Originally posted by: dolph:-/... are you asking if there are any universal values that permeate all life, regardless of society?Originally posted by: aphexIIBut your speaking about within a set of rules, we were trying to step out of society and look at the picture from a whole...Originally posted by: FoBoTso barbecuing a baby alive and eating it is ok, sometimes? i am thinking there is no human society where it is ok to cook a human baby alive and eat it even in tribal societies the practiced canibalism, there were rules about who go eaten and under what circumstancesOriginally posted by: aphexII ...but our point was that there is always an exception. This then brought us into a debate on the definition of 'universal' and we came out with the understanding that it means 'unequivocally everyone'. In which case, i dont see any universal values that everyone holds true....
ok. i don't want to give it away without letting anyone else have a chance, so i'll take a step back for a few... but if no one answers, i'll buzz in.
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
yes, but unless you can somehow see ahead in the future, you'll never know whether those values will survive... furthermore, even if you could, you have no guarantee that the value was a deciding factor... in other words, you have no guarantee that the value was not superfluous.
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
yes, but unless you can somehow see ahead in the future, you'll never know whether those values will survive... furthermore, even if you could, you have no guarantee that the value was a deciding factor... in other words, you have no guarantee that the value was not superfluous.
I dont think time is as important IMO. Things can be universally accepted without having to have lasted for thousands of years.... For instance, that we know the earth is round. We all know its true, but we didnt always know this...
Originally posted by: gopunk
yes, but unless you can somehow see ahead in the future, you'll never know whether those values will survive... furthermore, even if you could, you have no guarantee that the value was a deciding factor... in other words, you have no guarantee that the value was not superfluous.Originally posted by: dolphah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.Originally posted by: gopunk well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
yes, but unless you can somehow see ahead in the future, you'll never know whether those values will survive... furthermore, even if you could, you have no guarantee that the value was a deciding factor... in other words, you have no guarantee that the value was not superfluous.Originally posted by: dolphah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.Originally posted by: gopunk well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
man, i wish it hasn't been 4 years since i took my last philosophy class... i forget some really helpful stuff when i don't use it.
anyway, as aphex points out above me, time isn't really important. one cannot completely guarantee anything forever because we don't know everything. it was a fallacy of some sort, i think. but because of this, we have to accept certain ideas (and no, universal values isn't one of them... yet 😉) in order to have any kind of debate of any kind. otherwise, there's no point to any of this and it's all meaningless (another point of view, for another thread maybe)
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
Remember that societies like the Aztecs and the Incas did not collapse from within. They collapsed due to the influence of an outside culture (the Spanish) which possessed superior technology. Had the Spanish not arrived, it's possible that the Aztecs and the Incas might have survived to the present day. The Aztecs valued human sacrifice, which is something not valued today in many cultures.
And.. the question was what some of those values are.. so please elaborate.
Lastly, some people in this thread are confusing ethical values with verifiable facts (i.e. the earth is a spheroid).
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
From an ethics standpoint, I don't believe that there are any. Values such as "the right to exist", "the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", "thou shalt not steal" et al are cultural artifacts. Mankind invented culture as a means of coexisting, but the underlying rules that provide a basis for each culture's function may be different depending on the local environment that formed the birthplace of that culture. Even religious beliefs are cultural artifacts, and are not based on absolutes.
Originally posted by: dolph
oh man, it's getting late and i have to take on all these people myself?!?
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
From an ethics standpoint, I don't believe that there are any. Values such as "the right to exist", "the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", "thou shalt not steal" et al are cultural artifacts. Mankind invented culture as a means of coexisting, but the underlying rules that provide a basis for each culture's function may be different depending on the local environment that formed the birthplace of that culture. Even religious beliefs are cultural artifacts, and are not based on absolutes.
you're right... kinda. don't you think there might be a reason why some (not all, but some) of these "cultural artifacts" seem... "universal?" let's put it this way: you're just a regular guy in 8th century... anywhere, where there's a recognizable society. you kill someone because you feel like it, and freely admit it. are you not accountable in any way for what you did? no, because any society that can stand up on its own has to adopt some values, otherwise wanton killing and destruction would destroy it. these values are almost exactly the same in any society, because chaos would ensue and humans wouldn't have been able to leave the caves to progress without a form of society based on some <EM>values</em>, that as time went on, were discovered to be <EM>universal.</em> there's the answer, boys and girls: universal values exist. even take animals: cannabilism is, for the most part, rare, and only occurs when necessary. instinctively, animals universally respect the rights of others in their species to exist (without fighting over something, i guess). it's not a learned trait, so where'd it come from? it's an inherent, universal value.
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: gopunk
well, since nobody wants to reply to my comment, i'll just keep on rambling by myself 😛 how do people find "universal values"? by looking at values held in societies... right? it is assumed that a "universal value" is so, because it has survived the test of time, and is present in all societies, correct? but this means that we can never know "universal values" because we have no guarantee that the societies we see will stand the test of time.
ah, but there were some values that were common through all societies, at least ones that worked and didn't collapse from within.
yes, but unless you can somehow see ahead in the future, you'll never know whether those values will survive... furthermore, even if you could, you have no guarantee that the value was a deciding factor... in other words, you have no guarantee that the value was not superfluous.
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Thanks to our natural instincts family is valued to some extend allover the world, for the purpose of survival of the species. And most people value their own ideas, values, habits, religion and culture above that of everyone else 😛
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Thanks to our natural instincts family is valued to some extend allover the world, for the purpose of survival of the species. And most people value their own ideas, values, habits, religion and culture above that of everyone else 😛
As much as i wish it could be, family isnt really a universal value. There are too many kids who run away from home or divorce their parents....