silverpig
Lifer
- Jul 29, 2001
- 27,703
- 12
- 81
Originally posted by: cchen
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: cchen
Originally posted by: silverpig
Waste. Of. Time.
Here you just have to do 2 first year english classes + 4 other arts classes for your science degree. I did 2 intro latin (actually 1, but it was year long), symbolic logic (philosophy, in progress), and I'll probably do another philosophy class later.
LOL. Waste of time? I think not. This set of classes as the core curriculum is the cornerstone of a great education. Even as an engineer I feel these classes greatly expand your knowledge and give you a better understand of society and the world.
Then take them as electives
Other people want to get out early. If I had to take those classes I'd not have time for general relativity, fluids, cosmology, elementary particles, and atomic physics (my electives in my physics/astro double major). Those are pretty important to me, and I'd rather not stick around for an extra year taking those other classes. I took a brief summary of those courses in my HS AP electives. You don't NEED to take those in order to have a good understanding of the world.
What would you say if I said everyone should take E&M, general relativity, and quantum because they govern pretty much EVERYTHING we do every day.
I do understand what you're saying but its very possible to fit those in with other classes you want to take. Actually most people here want to take those classes as they are taught by some of the greatest minds in their respective fields.
If everyone wants to take them and can fit them in, then there shouldn't be any problem with leaving them as electives... Then the few who really don't want to take all of those courses don't have to.
I just think university should be about educational freedom. You go there because you want to, and you take what you want to. We have 3 world leaders in physics/astro at my university, and some people take their courses as electives, but no one is required to take them.
