• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Western Digital or Seagate

frizzybangs

Junior Member
I am looking at buying a new hard drive and i don't know which one to get. I have always bought wd but now i am looking at the seagate barracuda. The drives that i am looking at are as follows:

Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 gb perpendicular recording (ST3320620AS)
Western Digital Caviar SE16 320 gb (WD3200KS)

Which one is the best drive? The higher price of the barracuda is not an issue right now.
Thanks in advance for the help.
 
OK then, I will give my reasons for choosing Seagate.

I've owned several Seagate drives and have yet to have a single one fail (knock on wood).
I've owned a few WD drives and have yet to have one fail.

However, in my experience, the Seagate drives have run cooler and quieter. That may not be the case with the newer WD drives.

Chances are you'll be happy with either one, but I personally feel more comfortable with Seagate's standard 5-yr warranty. The only WD drive I own at the moment is my Raptor, and that's because it came with a 5-yr warranty.

If I had a choice between the 320GB Seagate and a 320GB WD, even if the WD was a bit faster in benches I personally would pick the Seagate because of the warranty.

Sorry, I didn't mean to speak for anyone else here. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Imyourzero
OK then, I will give my reasons for choosing Seagate.

I've owned several Seagate drives and have yet to have a single one fail (knock on wood).
I've owned a few WD drives and have yet to have one fail.

However, in my experience, the Seagate drives have run cooler and quieter. That may not be the case with the newer WD drives.

Chances are you'll be happy with either one, but I personally feel more comfortable with Seagate's standard 5-yr warranty. The only WD drive I own at the moment is my Raptor, and that's because it came with a 5-yr warranty.

If I had a choice between the 320GB Seagate and a 320GB WD, even if the WD was a bit faster in benches I personally would pick the Seagate because of the warranty.

Sorry, I didn't mean to speak for anyone else here. 🙂

It's been a lil bit difference experience for me.

I have owned a couple WD hard drives and none have failed. However, my current one(120 gig 8MB cache) runs with a bit of a high pitch tone to it(Think like a CRT TV that is running) which is annoying.

I have owned 2 Seagates. Unfortunately, I only bought one. I got the Seagate at christmas and installed it that day. I made it my multimedia drive and transferred my pictures+music from my WD drive to the Seagate. All was good.

Then a month later I am at college and all of a sudden my computer sounds like a vacuum cleaner. I said "WTF" and proceded to shut it off. Trying to figure out what it was I turned it back on sitting close to the case. It started up again and the sound was gone. Not knowing whether it was a fan or something else I let it go. A few short minutes later, the vacuum cleaner sound was back. I turn off my computer this time after confirming it was the hard drive. Fearing for my important data, I turned back on my computer to back up the data. No more boot. In order to boot I had to disconnect the hard drive.

To sum it up, my data was lost. School projects, pictures, music...everything. I did not expect this out of a new drive less than 1 month old.

I called up seagate as having a fully functional computer was important to me at school. Their "customer service" I had heard so many good things about failed to impress me. It was your standard "dell service". AKA I can't understand a word your saying. I had to request to speak to management just to get a drive sent out within a few days to replace mine. Having to do that was unacceptable IMO and really makes me think less of their warranty.

Yes, I did get a new drive and it is currently working. However, it does occasionally make a loud "CLICK" which scares me. But its been doing it since I got the drive and all the drive tests I have ran have come up clean.

This is just my one experience and YRMV but I am wary about buying another Seagate drive which is a real shame.
 
Western Digital or Seagate - which 320 gb drive is the better drive

Personally I prefer WD but in actuallity it probably comes down to:
Do they both have 5yr warranties? If so go with the cheaper one.
 
Well that sucks. I'm sorry you had a bad experience because IME they are excellent drives. If they start crapping out on me though, I'll be looking for another HD mfg also, but until then I'm sticking with `em.

There is no product with a 100% success rate, so everyone is bound to have a bad experience at one time or another.
 
I usually buy WD drives, just because I am set in my ways. But I did pickup a 7200.9 300 GB drive a couple of weeks ago for the wifes computer and must say I am impressed with it.

 
If you're talking about speed, the 7200.10 320gb is the FASTEST 7200 RPM drive out there.

When you talk reliability, while 7200.8s were unreliable, so far 7200.9s and 7200.10s are holding up.

IN GENERAL, Seagate has better reliability than WD, but things are changing so rapidly, who knows now.....

I personally woudl pick Seagate.
 
I like my Western Digital internal drives and my Seagate external drives. Never had a problem with both company products.
 
WD drivers are easier to RMA IMO.
But for me the choice would be price.
HDD's rarely have any noticable diffrence in actual performance heck 10K Raptors are BARELY faster than any 7200 RPM drive and they probably even get beat in some benchmarks.
 
I've never had a Seagate die on me, and I just bought my first WD a couple months ago and it seems to be doing fine, but I'd still choose Seagate.
 
seagate is 5 year warranty and wd is 3 year on sata drives, 1 year on IDE, and 5 years on any RE or RE2 drives. The .10s are new with perpendicular recording... So i'm hoping they'll hold up. Personally for reliability I just pick up the enterprise series drives, they arn't that much more expensive, and they usually have double the MTBF of regular drives.
 
Man, the last 7 replies have said Seagate. I thought there were some Seagate fans here...where were you guys this morning? 😛
 
Thanks everyone for the replies. It will make my decision easier. BTW...why is it so hard to choose hardware. I mean it's not like it is a life or death decision. I don't know, just curious. Thanks again
 
Originally posted by: frizzybangs
Thanks everyone for the replies. It will make my decision easier. BTW...why is it so hard to choose hardware. I mean it's not like it is a life or death decision. I don't know, just curious. Thanks again

because people have been trained (marketing) to look at nothing but numbers and assume that tiny differences add up to huge real world differences.
 
I have been using only WD for the last couple few years, good support, only one drive out of close to 10 gave me trouble. Recently i just picked up the 320 7200.10 based on reviews from users and on websites and i must say that i am very impressed. Its very quiet compared to my raptor and cooler than my 120 gig wd. Looks like i will be sticking with these drives for a while. 🙂
 
I got the WD over the Seagate a while ago. I was a little paranoid that there may be huge problems with perpendicular recording some time down the road. I got bit in the ass with a new harddrive technology (IBM's pixie dust) before... I also heard that those Seagate drives have pretty loud seeks, while I can hardly hear my WD drive seek.
 
Originally posted by: frizzybangs
Thanks everyone for the replies. It will make my decision easier. BTW...why is it so hard to choose hardware. I mean it's not like it is a life or death decision. I don't know, just curious. Thanks again

Because:
1) You're someone to takes "buyer beware" to heart.
2) Because no one likes to part with money.
3) Because it's a pain in the butt when hardware fails.
 
Back
Top